tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-77537084244590523902024-02-19T23:09:57.457-08:00Protect Your Family~Know Your RightsDefend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-86497091593623093662011-02-25T07:37:00.000-08:002011-02-25T07:37:20.071-08:00FACFCPA Blog Talk - A Must HearFAC FIGHTING CPS<br />
ON BLOG TALK RADIO<br />
FRIDAY FEBRUARY 25, 2011<br />
<br />
FACFCPS BLOGTALK # 51: 8th PART OF A SERIES:<br />
<br />
TONIGHT'S SHOW FOR FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2011, <br />
DEDICATED TO THE 8th COURT CIRCUIT, WHICH<br />
INCLUDES THE STATES OF: <br />
AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, & WA.<br />
<br />
ALSO: DUE TO THE UPCOMING PLANS OF A RALLY,<br />
TO BE HELD ON AUG 12, 2011, <br />
AND <br />
TO THE CONFERENCE CALL OF NEW YORK ATTORNEY,<br />
LEON KOZIOL <br />
(which notices have been sent out to all, regarding that telephone<br />
conference, by me, on Sunday, Feb 13, 2011),<br />
WE WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSING OUR OPINIONS OF THAT <br />
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL, AS WELL AS WHAT WE<br />
ARE PLANNING FOR AUGUST 12, 2011.<br />
<br />
ATTORNEY LEON KOZIOL IS A FORMER CONGRESSMAN<br />
AND A SCHOOL BOARD ATTORNEY, WHO HAS BEEN <br />
PRACTICING LAW FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS AS A CIVIL<br />
RIGHTS ATTORNEY, & FOUNDED THE GROUP, <br />
"PARENTS RIGHTS INSTITUTE," <br />
WHICH IS A GROUP OF PARENTS FIGHTING TO REFORM<br />
CUSTODY AND CHILD SUPPORT LAWS IN THE STATE OF <br />
NEW YORK (AND BEYOND?).<br />
<br />
Listen to Leon Kozial on blog talk radio, with Syndicated News:<br />
<a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/syndicatednews/2010/10/21/leon-koziol-is-an-alienated-parent-that-also-fight" target="_blank">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/<wbr></wbr>syndicatednews/2010/10/21/<wbr></wbr>leon-koziol-is-an-alienated-<wbr></wbr>parent-that-also-fight</a><br />
<br />
Read Leon Kozial's announcement "Parent's Alert!"<br />
<a href="http://leonkoziol.com/" target="_blank">http://leonkoziol.com/</a><br />
<br />
NOW: INFO REGARDING THE BLOG TALK:<br />
{I am including links to my google site, which I've dumped thousands of files,<br />
pertaining to laws, court forms, etc, including info for various states}<br />
<br />
ARKANSAS:<br />
<br />
ARIZONA:<br />
<br />
CALIFORNIA:<br />
<br />
AND THE INFAMOUS STORY OF DEANNA FOGARTY-<br />
HARDWICK: <br />
Published: May 21, 2007 3:00 a.m.<br />
Mom sees social services win as help for others:VICTORIOUS MOM: Deanna Fogarty recently won a $4.9<br />
million judgement against the County of Orange after social<br />
workers wrongfully took her children away from her.<br />
<a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/Fogarty-Hardwick/social_services/prweb4157254.htm" target="_blank">http://www.prweb.com/releases/<wbr></wbr>Fogarty-Hardwick/social_<wbr></wbr>services/prweb4157254.htm</a><br />
<br />
HAWAII:<br />
<br />
IDAHO:<br />
<br />
MONTANA:<br />
<br />
NEVADA:<br />
<br />
WASHINGTON:<br />
ah, Washington; the home of the infamous<br />
Troxel Case<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES<br />
TROXEL et vir. v. GRANVILLE<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-138.ZS.html" target="_blank">http://www.law.<wbr></wbr>cornell.edu/supct/html/99-138.<wbr></wbr>ZS.html</a><br />
<br />
PLEASE NOTE: <br />
Have more info on the sites located on the<br />
webs social network, which links I've also<br />
included, and within the google site I've <br />
created:<br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/facfcpsinfo/home" target="_blank">https://sites.google.com/site/<wbr></wbr>facfcpsinfo/home</a><br />
<br />
FIRST: PLEASE TAKE NOTE:<br />
You can either log into the blog talk page and listen to the show on <br />
your computer, and/or use the call in number, especially if you'd like <br />
to participate.<br />
<br />
IF YOU CALL INTO THE PROGRAM:<br />
Please push or dial number 1 on your phone pad, and I will know that<br />
you would like to speak on the program.<br />
<br />
HOWEVER:<br />
I am not able to view people's names, only phone numbers; so please <br />
be advised that I will only call out your area code and say, <br />
"You're on the air!"<br />
<br />
Lisa NJGrandma4justice <br />
4 FAMILIES AGAINST CORRUPTION FIGHTING CPS <br />
(FACFCPS)<br />
<br />
HERE IS THE INFORMATION FOR THIS SATURDAY NIGHT'S AIRING:<br />
((please click on the show's name, or the link directly below that, <br />
to be brought straight to the show's page))<br />
<br />
FAMILIES AGAINST CORRUPTION FIGHTING CPSDate: FRIDAY FEBRUARY 25, 2011TIME: 11 PM EST {Eastern Savings Time} 10 PM CST {Central Savings Time} 9 PM MST {Mountain Savings Time} 8 PM PST Pacific Savings Time}<br />
Category: Family<br />
Call-in Number: 1-646-727-1679<br />
OUR SHOWS ARE DEDICATED FOR OUR DEAR, BELOVED FRIEND, <br />
ROBIN {06/18/80~06/18/10}, AS SHE IS NOW WITH ANGELS, <br />
WATCHING OVER HER PRECIOUS CHILDREN. WE SUPPORT <br />
HER FAMILY AS THEY TAKE ROBIN'S PLACE IN FAMILY <br />
COURT~ FIGHTING CPS!<br />
<br />
CHAT ROOM:To participate in the chat room, scroll down the page; you can enter <br />
the chat room as a guest, or you can log into your blogtalk account, <br />
and your user name for blog talk will appear in the participant's <br />
window, as long you sign in (and have an account with <a href="http://blogtalkradio.com/" target="_blank">blogtalkradio.com</a>).<br />
NOTE: This is NOW A 30 MINUTE blog talk, but we have up to <br />
1 HOUR To talk together; however, the first 30 minutes of the <br />
show will be recorded,and available for others to listen at any <br />
time by visiting the show page, and using the blogtalk radio player.<br />
NOTE: in order to be able to participate in the blogtalk, or to<br />
participate in the chat room, you must call into the show, or enter <br />
the chat room, within the first 30 minutes of this blogtalk; forthose who called in and/or enter the chat prior to the end of theshow (11:30 pm est),they will continue to remain on the call until12 am EST, but can remain in the Chat Room indefinitely.Also Note: <br />
no one will be able to call in or enter chat room after 1130pm EST.<br />
You can also click to below link, and then click on tonight's <br />
show; if you do not see the chat room loading, after you <br />
scroll down, then the chat room has not yet been opened <br />
by me..<br />
HOST: FamiliesAgainstCorruption<br />
<br />
<br />
Gathering of souls tarnished, but not totally <br />
destroyed, by corrupted cps employees.<br />
<br />
DISCLAIMER: WE ARE NOT ATTORNEYS:<br />
I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, HOWEVER, I AM A GRADUATE OF A PARALEGAL PROGRAM, <br />
FROM A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AND DO HAVE AN AAS IN LEGAL ASSISTING;<br />
THEREFORE, I CAN ASSIST OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND THE LAWS THAT PERTAIN<br />
TO OUR GOVERNMENT'S ILLEGAL ABDUCTION OF OUR BELOVED CHILDREN,<br />
as I can explain the laws/statutes, but without, actually, providing legal advice.<br />
We, as a group, have many opinions, and opinions, as well as suggestions, are<br />
warmly received (nothing wrong with arguing points, as this is what SUPPOSED<br />
to go on in a 'court of law').<br />
<br />
Also, any comment made by any quest of this show does not necessarily mirror<br />
the beliefs of this blogtalk's owner, and vice versa; please note that under our<br />
First Amendment (Free Speech), we are all entitled to our opinions, and are <br />
able to express such, as per our Constitutional Rights.<br />
LISA NJG4JUSTICE<br />
<a href="mailto:njgrandma4justice@yahoo.com" target="_blank">njgrandma4justice@yahoo.com</a><br />
<a href="mailto:facfcps@gmail.com" target="_blank">facfcps@gmail.com</a><br />
<br />
Lisa NJG "No one can make you feel inferior without your consent" Eleanor Roosevelt <a href="mailto:njgrandma4justice@yahoo.com" target="_blank">njgrandma4justice@yahoo.com</a><a href="http://myspace.com/njgrandma4justice" target="_blank">myspace.com/njgrandma4justice</a> Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-36909152921402314442011-01-25T19:32:00.000-08:002011-01-25T19:34:19.017-08:00AZ Sheriffs Can't Read Fourth Amendment<span style="font-size: small;">According to the article noted at the bottom of this blog, a statement made:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br />
"</span><span style="font-size: small;">The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was<b> not clear enough<img alt="B-)" height="18" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/14.gif" width="18" /></b> for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home <b>violated the Fourth Amendment</b>. "</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">_____________ </span></div><span style="font-size: small;">Thought I missed something, so for all of us to read. <b>Do you understand these words</b>?? as it seems the sheriffs in AZ didn't understand. (Please note, I also have a link in Spanish)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Fourth Amendment</b></span> <br />
<span style="font-size: small;">"The right of the people to be <b>secure</b> in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, <b>against unreasonable</b> searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and<b> no Warrants</b> shall issue, but upon<b> probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation</b>, and <b>particularly</b> describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."</span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>Enmienda 4</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">El derecho de los habitantes de que sus personas, domicilios, papeles y efectos se hallen a salvo de pesquisas y aprehensiones arbitrarias, será inviolable, y no se expedirán al efecto mandamientos que no se apoyen en un motivo verosimil, estén corroborados mediante juramento o protesta y describan con particularidad el lugar que deba ser registrado y las personas o cosas que han de ser detenidas o embargadas.</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">___________________ </span></div><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">I wonder what grade the sheriffs got in the US Constitution Test??? (Ref: <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Constitution/index.htm">http://nfpcar.org/Constitution/index.htm</a> & Most Definitely: <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Miranda/">http://nfpcar.org/Miranda/</a> )</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">_________________</span></div><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
<b>Here is the story:</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Original Link: <a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201101240.asp">http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201101240.asp</a></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case</b></span><br />
</span></div><span style="font-size: small;">In March of 2005, two social <nobr><a class="FAAdLink" href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201101240.asp#" id="FALINK_2_0_1">workers</a></nobr> and six deputy sheriffs descended on the home of John and Tiffany Loudermilk to “investigate” a two-month-old anonymous tip that their house was unsafe for children. After almost an hour of threats, the social workers finally threatened to take all of their children into custody if not allowed inside. The Loudermilks reluctantly agreed. The assembled officials took less than five minutes to determine that the allegations in the anonymous report were false.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">HSLDA reviewed the case and sued the social workers, their attorney, and four of the deputies for violating the Loudermilks’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. We also sued the social workers for threatening to remove their children without justification. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">The judge denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss in September 2007, and then denied their motions for summary judgment in March 2010. <b> The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was not clear enough for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home violated the Fourth Amendment. </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/Appellants_brief_11-16-10.pdf">Click here to read their brief</a> to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (requires <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html">Adobe Acrobat Reader</a>).</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/Loudermilk_brief_1-13-11.pdf">In HSLDA’s answering brief</a>, we argued that the law has been clearly established for at least 10 years, ever since we successfully sued social workers on behalf of the Calabretta family in a similar case. We also demonstrated that any reasonable officer should know that threatening to remove a child to gain the “cooperation” of the parents is inherently coercive and that the officers should have known so at the time.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Within the next few weeks the appellate court will either decide the case or will schedule oral argument. In the meantime, proceedings in the trial court are on hold.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=3690915292140231444" name="OtherResources"></a><table bgcolor="#000066" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody>
<tr><td><img align="BOTTOM" alt="" border="0" height="8" hspace="2" src="http://www.hslda.org/img/pix/White.gif" width="8" /><span style="color: white; font-family: Verdana;"> <b>Other Resources</b></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=3690915292140231444" name="OtherResources"> </a><a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201004010.asp">“Judge Upholds Family’s Right to Day in Court”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">July/August 2010 <i>Court Report</i>: <a href="http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/V26N4/V26N406.asp">“Family Wins Round Two”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">September/October 2009 <i>Court Report</i>: <a href="http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/V25N5/V25N508.asp">“Arguments Proceed in Federal Lawsuit”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">January/February 2008 <i>Court Report</i>: <a href="http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/V24N1/V24N111.asp">“Judge Slams Coercive Tactics”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> <a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/200710220.asp">“Judge Rules Social Worker Fear Tactics Unconstitutional”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"> <a href="http://www.hslda.org/Legal/state/az/MrandMrsLvsApaioetal/default.asp">“Social Workers and Sheriff’s Deputies Violate Family’s 4th and 14th Amendment Rights”</a> </span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201101240.asp?PrinterFriendly=True" target="_blank"> <span style="font-family: Verdana;"><img align="MIDDLE" alt="" border="0" height="16" src="http://www.hslda.org/img/icon/Printer.gif" width="16" /></span></a></span><span style="font-size: small;"> ____________________</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,<br />
Granpa Chuck<br />
</span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-12490302709064127252010-12-21T11:19:00.000-08:002010-12-21T11:19:13.790-08:00Keep the Competive Edge for Us Common Folk<div align="left"><img alt="Consumers Union Action Fund" border="0" src="http://cu.convio.net/images/content/pagebuilder/12362.jpg" /></div><br />
<br />
Many of our holiday wish-lists include cell phones, smart phones and flat-screen TVs. But the industries that push those products have their own wish-lists.<br />
<strong>They want to stop efforts in the New Year designed to give us a better deal on our phones, Internet and cable!</strong> They know if they can keep the status quo, they can continue their sneaky fees and confusing billing tactics that drain our wallets each month. <br />
<strong>These media giants may be planning their attack, but we’ll be there to stand up for consumers in the New Year!</strong> Consumers Union will work to inform you about the latest telecom industry tricks, and arm you with information so you can get the best deals. And we'll continue to fight to improve your finances, as well your family's health and safety!<br />
<a href="http://cu.convio.net/site/R?i=XOdrc0G7xqooPhqBG06UQA.." target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Your $15 gift will help us fight for your rights and support our work in the New Year!</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></a><br />
Your donation will help us keep you involved in a range of consumer issues – your financial security, health care and family's safety – and continue to fight for your rights. In the telecom arena, we'll be working to make companies: <br />
<ul><li><strong>Text or email you before you go over your cell phone limits</strong>, so you don’t get hit with huge overage charges. </li>
<li><strong>End excessive early-termination fees</strong> if you cancel your contact.</li>
<li><strong>Allow your phone to work on any provider’s network</strong>, so you can get the best deal on minutes, text messaging and Internet. </li>
<li><strong>Don't eliminate competition through mega-media buyouts – such as the Comcast/NBC merger</strong> – so our cable and Internet bills aren’t padded to cover the cost, and free programming isn’t taken away. </li>
<li><strong>Have limits on how they monitor your online activity</strong>, especially sensitive health, financial, race and sexual orientation information that many now track. </li>
</ul>The special interests are powerful, having spent millions this year to push their agenda. <strong>We don’t need millions, but we do need your help so we can continue to work for consumers in the New Year on these and other issues.</strong><br />
<a href="http://cu.convio.net/site/R?i=kb5WM43Y6Myc9EhXM2wToA.." target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Your $15 donation will help us fight for your rights! Give before Dec. 31!</span></a><br />
We understand times are tough, so if you can’t donate, please forward this to others so they can join the fight. Thank you for all you do!<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Kathy Mitchell<br />
Consumers Union Action Fund, Inc.<br />
506 W. 14th Street<br />
Austin, TX 78701Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-15804427022398225242010-12-15T20:24:00.000-08:002010-12-15T20:58:15.743-08:0020 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD<span style="font-family: Verdana;"><b>From:<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> <a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn1">http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={B56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8}&DE=#_fn1</a>)</span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana;"><b>Ten things you need to know about the structure of the CRC:</b></span><br />
<ul><span style="font-family: Verdana;">
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_1">It is a treaty which creates binding rules of law. It is no mere statement of altruism.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn1"><span style="color: darkred;">1.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_2">Its effect would be binding on American families, courts, and policy-makers.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn2"><span style="color: darkred;">2.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_3">Children of other nations would not be impacted or helped in any direct way by our ratification.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn3"><span style="color: darkred;">3.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_4">The CRC would automatically override almost all American laws on children and families because of the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause in Article VI.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn4"><span style="color: darkred;">4.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_5">The CRC has some elements that are self-executing, while others would require implementing legislation. Federal courts would have the power to determine which provisions were self-executing.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn5"><span style="color: darkred;">5.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_6">The courts would have the power to directly enforce the provisions that are self-executing.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn6"><span style="color: darkred;">6.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_7">Congress would have the power to directly legislate on all subjects necessary to comply with the treaty. This would constitute the most massive shift of power from the states to the federal government in American history.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn7"><span style="color: darkred;">7.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_8">A committee of 18 experts from other nations, sitting in Geneva, has the authority to issue official interpretations of the treaty which are entitled to binding weight in American courts and legislatures. This effectively transfers ultimate authority for all policies in this area to this foreign committee.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn8"><span style="color: darkred;">8.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_9">Under international law, the treaty overrides even our Constitution.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn9"><span style="color: darkred;">9.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_10">Reservations, declarations, or understandings intended to modify our duty to comply with this treaty will be void if they are determined to be inconsistent with the object and purpose of the treaty.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn10"><span style="color: darkred;">10.</span></a></sup></li>
</span></ul><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><b>Ten things you need to know about the substance of the CRC:</b></span><br />
<ul style="font-family: Verdana;"><li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_13">Children would have the ability to choose their own religion while parents would only have the authority to give their children advice about religion.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn13"><span style="color: darkred;">13.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_14">The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent’s decision.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn14"><span style="color: darkred;">14.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_15">A child’s “right to be heard” would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which the child disagreed.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_15"><span style="color: darkred;">15.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_16">According to existing interpretation, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than it does on children’s welfare.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn16"><span style="color: darkred;">16.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_17">Children would acquire a legally enforceable right to leisure.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn17"><span style="color: darkred;">17.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_18">Christian schools that refuse to teach "alternative worldviews" and teach that Christianity is the only true religion "fly in the face of article 29" of the treaty.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn18"><span style="color: darkred;">18.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="19">Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn19"><span style="color: darkred;">19.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_20">Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental knowledge or consent.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_fn20"><span style="color: darkred;">20. </span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_11">Parents would no longer be able to administer reasonable spankings to their children.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?PARENTADMINSEC=AdminSummaryPage&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&ADMINSEC=WizardPage&DE=%7B28AD510A-A544-432C-9A8A-5BACD2312109%7D#_fn11"><span style="color: darkred;">11.</span></a></sup></li>
<li><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_12">A murderer aged 17 years and 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime could no longer be sentenced to life in prison.</a><sup><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?PARENTADMINSEC=AdminSummaryPage&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&ADMINSEC=WizardPage&DE=%7B28AD510A-A544-432C-9A8A-5BACD2312109%7D#_fn12"><span style="color: darkred;">12.</span></a></sup></li>
</ul><hr /><span style="font-family: Verdana;">NOTES:</span><br />
<ol><span style="font-family: Verdana;">
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_1"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn1"><i>Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</i>, Article 26 “<i>Pacta sunt servanda</i>”:<br />
“Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.”<br />
<br />
<i>United States Constitution</i>, Article VI: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”<br />
<br />
UNICEF “Convention on the Rights of the Child” says: “the Convention is a universally agreed set of non-negotiable standards and obligations.” Available at </a><span style="color: darkred;"><a href="http://www.unicef.org/crc/" target="_new"><span style="color: darkred;">http://www.unicef.org/crc/</span></a></span> on 12/2/2008.<br />
</li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_2"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn2"><i>Vienna Convention</i> Article 26 (<i>supra</i>);<br />
<br />
United States Supreme Court, <i>Whitney v. Robertson</i>, 124 U.S. 190 (1888): “By the Constitution of the United States, a treaty and a statute are placed on the same footing, and if the two are inconsistent, the one last in date will control, provided the stipulation of the treaty on the subject is self-executing.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_3"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn3"><i>Vienna Convention </i>(<i>supra</i>) and Article 2 (g): “‘party’ means a State which has consented to be bound by the treaty and for which the treaty is in force”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_4"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn4"><i>United States Constitution</i>, Article VI (<i>supra, </i>Note 1)<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_5"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn5">Arlene Bowers Andrews, <i>Implementing the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, 171 (Greenwood Publishing Group 1999): “The Convention is generally regarded as having two classes of rights for the purposes of self-execution, one class that is self-executing and one that is not self-executing."<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_6"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn6">United States Supreme Court, <i>Medellin v. Texas</i>, 552 U.S. ___ (2008), at 170 L.Ed. 2d 190, 219, “And whether the treaties underlying a judgment are self-executing so that the judgment is directly enforceable as domestic law in our courts is, of course, a matter for this Court to decide.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_7"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn7">Inter-Agency Standing Committee Reference Group on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, <i>Frequently Asked Questions on International Humanitarian, Human Rights, and Refugee Law</i>, (2002), available at http://www.icva.ch/doc00001023.html#24:<br />
“Human rights law also contains provisions obliging states to implement its rules, whether immediately or progressively. States must adopt a variety of legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures that may be necessary to give effect to the rights provided for in the various treaties. This includes providing for a remedy before domestic courts for violations of specific rights and ensuring that the remedy is effective. The fact that a state has a federal or devolved system of government does not affect a state's obligation to implement human rights law.”<br />
<br />
United States Supreme Court, <i>Reid v. Covert</i>, 354 U.S. 1 (1957): “To the extent that the United States can validly make treaties, the people and the States have delegated their power to the National Government and the Tenth Amendment is no barrier.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_8"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn8"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Articles 43 (amended) and 44. Available at </a><a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm#art43" style="color: darkred;" target="_new">http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm#art43</a>.<br />
</li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_9"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn9"><i>Vienna Convention</i>, Article 27: “ A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_10"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn10"><i>Vienna Convention</i>, Article 19, available at available at </a><a href="http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.law.of.treaties.convention.1969/19.html" target="_new"><span style="color: darkred;">http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.law.of.treaties.convention.1969/19.html</span></a>; also<br />
<br />
Louis Henkin, <i>U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker</i>, The American Journal of International Law, Vol 89 No 2, 343-344 (Apr. 1995):<br />
“Reservations designed to reject any obligation to rise above existing law and practice are of dubious propriety: if states generally entered such reservations, the convention would be futile. The object and purpose of the human rights conventions, it would seem, are to promote respect for human rights by having countries—mutually—assume legal obligations to respect and ensure recognized rights in accordance with international standards. Even friends of the United States have objected that its reservations are incompatible with that object and purpose and are therefore invalid. <br />
…By adhering to human rights conventions subject to these reservations, the United States, it is charged, is pretending to assume international obligations but in fact is undertaking nothing.”<br />
</li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_11"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn11"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Article 37(a):<br />
“No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age”<br />
<br />
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, <i>General Comment No. 8 (2006): The right of the child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment (arts. 19; 28, para. 2; and 37, inter alia), </i>CRC/C/GC/8, (2006):<br />
“The Committee is issuing this general comment to highlight the obligation of all State parties to move quickly to prohibit and eliminate all corporal punishment…. Addressing the widespread acceptance or tolerance of corporal punishment of children and eliminating it, in the family, schools and other settings, is … an obligation of State parties under the Convention.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_12"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn12"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Article 37(a), (supra)<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_13"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn13"><i>The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Guide for Children and Young People</i> (April 2008), available at </a><span style="color: darkred;"><span style="color: darkred;"><span style="color: darkred;"><a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/04/01081649/1" target="_new"><span style="color: darkred;">http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/04/01081649/1</span></a></span></span></span>: “You have the right to choose your own religion and beliefs. Your parents should help you think about this.”<br />
<br />
Geraldine Van Bueren, <i>International Rights of the Child, Section B</i>, University of London, 29-30 (2006):<br />
“Unlike earlier treaties, the Convention on the Rights of the Child does not include a provision providing for parents to have their children educated in conformity with their parents’ beliefs. In addition, the child’s right to freedom of expression and the right of the parents to initially give direction and later only guidance, strengthens the argument that children are entitled to participate in decisions so that their education conforms to their own convictions.... The second question is whether a child has the right to choose a religion. <br />
Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, parents do have the right to provide direction to the child. Such parental power, however, is subject to two restraints:<br />
• First, such direction should take into account the evolving capacities of the child, as expressly required by the Convention. <br />
• Second, the direction should not be so unyielding that it equals coercion.<br />
It can also be argued that the right to freedom of religion in the Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be read together with article 12 which gives the child the right to express his own views in the matter of choice of religion." <br />
</li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_14"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn14"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Article 3(1): “In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.”<br />
<br />
Geraldine Van Bueren, <i>International Rights of the Child, Section D</i>, University of London, 46 (2006):<br />
“Best interests provides decision and policy makers with the authority to substitute their own decisions for either the child's or the parents', providing it is based on considerations of the best interests of the child. Thus, the Convention challenges the concept that family life is always in the best interests of children and that parents are always capable of deciding what is best for children.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_15"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn15"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Article 12(1): “State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.”<br />
<br />
Inter-Agency Standing Committee Reference Group: “Human rights law also contains provisions obliging states to implement its rules, whether immediately or progressively. States must adopt a variety of legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures that may be necessary to give effect to the rights provided for in the various treaties. This includes providing for a remedy before domestic courts for violations of specific rights and ensuring that the remedy is effective.”<br />
<br />
Geraldine Van Bueren, <i>International Rights of the Child, Section D</i>, 137: “State parties are obliged to ‘assure’ to children who are capable of forming views the rights to express those views ‘in all matter affecting the child’ and to give those views’ due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child’. By incorporating a reference to ‘all matters affecting the child’ there is no longer a traditional area of exclusive parental or family decision making.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_16"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn16"><i>ibid</i>., at 36: “[T]he United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, criticized Egypt and Indonesia on the proportion of their budget spent on defence, as compared to the proportion spent on children’s social expenditure." <br />
<br />
The Committee also criticized Austria, Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and others failing to spend enough tax dollars on social welfare for children:<br />
<br />
Paragraph 46, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Austria</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 38th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.251 (2005).<br />
<br />
Paragraph 17 and 18, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Australia</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 40th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.268 (2005).<br />
<br />
Paragraphs 18 and 19, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Denmark</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 40th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/DNK/CO/3 (2005).<br />
<br />
Paragraph 10, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 31st sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.188(2002).<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_17"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn17"><i>United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child</i>, Article 31(1): “States Parties recognize the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts.”<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/%20#_18"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn18">American Bar Association, Center on Children and the Law: <i>Children's Rights in America: UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Compared with United States Law</i>, p. 182.<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=#_19"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn19">Paragraph 52, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Ireland</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 43rd sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/IRL/CO/2 (2006):<br />
“While noting that social, personal and health education is incorporated into the curricula of secondary schools, the Committee is concerned that adolescents have insufficient access to necessary information on reproductive health. The education is optional and parents can exempt their children.”<br />
<br />
Paragraph 14, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 8th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.34 (1995).<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://parentalrights.org/%20#_20"><span style="color: darkred;">-</span></a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=1580442702239822524" name="_fn20">Katie Hatziavramidis, <i>Parental Involvement Laws for Abortion in the United States and the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of the Child: Can International Law Secure the Right to Choose for Minors?, </i>16 Tex. J. Women & L. 185, 202-203 (Spring 2007):<br />
“The unmistakable trend in the United States is to consistently increase anti-choice legislation, particularly with respect to minors. Ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child by the United States holds a strong possibility of assisting minors who seek abortions without parental interference. [*203] The Convention may offer the best hope for securing adolescent reproductive freedoms on a global level. If enough diplomatic pressure were exerted on the United States to compel it to ratify the treaty, the CRC could provide significant improvements in the outlook for reproductive freedom for minors.”<br />
<br />
Paragraph 3, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Columbia</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 42nd sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/COL/CO/3 (2006): “The Committee notes with appreciation…decisions of the Constitutional Court on…the partial decriminalization of abortion.”<br />
<br />
Paragraph 55, <i>Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Chile</i>, Committee on the Rights of the Child, 44th sess., U.N. Doc. CRC/C/CHL/CO/3 (2007): “The Committee…is concerned over the high rate of teenage pregnancies, the criminalization of the termination of pregnancies in all circumstances….”</a></li>
</span></ol>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-34172353273256768012010-12-15T19:52:00.000-08:002010-12-15T20:28:00.646-08:00Parents Don't be Fooled by the UN Treaty<div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; text-align: center;"><b>Watch This video and then Visit Our site on the </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Proposed United States Parental Rights Constitutional Amendment</b></div><div style="text-align: center;">Link: <a href="http://www.nfpcar.org/Rights/index.htm">http://www.nfpcar.org/Rights/index.htm</a><br />
<b>Also</b><br />
<a href="http://mirandaawarness.blogspot.com/2010/12/20-things-you-need-to-know-about-un.html">20 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD</a><br />
<br />
</div><br />
<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_i3MUFatgW8?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_i3MUFatgW8?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<table background="http://www.parentalrights.org/vertical/Sites/{C49108C5-0630-467E-9B9B-B1FA31A72320}/uploads/{930580CF-AFE8-4E03-A168-2B21CDF250BA}.JPG" style="height: 215px; width: 367px;"><tbody>
<tr><td><br />
<br />
</td></tr>
<tr align="middle" style="background-color: grey; color: white; font-family: Verdana;"><td><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7B47C34D19-835D-42EC-92C2-E9D042052769%7D" style="color: white; text-decoration: none;">Status of the Resolution to STOP the CRC</a></span></td></tr>
<tr align="middle" style="background-color: grey; color: white; font-family: Verdana;"><td><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB56D7393-E583-4658-85E6-C1974B1A57F8%7D&DE=" style="color: white; text-decoration: none;">20 Things You Need to Know about the CRC</a></span></td></tr>
<tr align="middle" style="background-color: grey; color: white; font-family: Verdana;"><td><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7B479C4F40-98CD-40B9-B8E5-7F1A7CF7E307%7D&DE=" style="color: white; text-decoration: none;">Are Criticisms of the CRC All 'Myths'?</a></span></td></tr>
<tr align="middle" style="background-color: grey; color: white; font-family: Verdana;"><td><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB80868B0-58EC-4B84-8C7F-68B88C5B077B%7D&DE=" style="color: white; text-decoration: none;">An In-Depth Analysis of the CRC</a></span></td></tr>
<tr><td><br />
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-1608038919421899462010-12-12T10:43:00.000-08:002010-12-12T17:43:38.893-08:00Conflict in Parents' Constitutional Rights<div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Recently, a member of our Discussion Group presented this Reference:</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b><a href="http://www.nopeohio.org/Cases/parenting%20as%20a%20protected%20constitutional%20right%20-%20crc.pdf">PARENTING AS A PROTECTED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT</a></b><span style="font-size: x-small;">(*See <b>Note</b> a bottom of page)</span><br />
When you read the above document; and my reply below, please consider these points:</div><ul style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><li> Is there a "Balance" between Parents' Rights & Children's Rights?</li>
<li>Are Laws Really Needed to Guide us in Raising Our Family?</li>
<li>When you Defend your Family, why is it so important to know the Statutes for Your State, particular to your concerns?</li>
<li>We must become an Advocate, and yes, admit to ourselves there is indeed conflict, corruption, biases, etc in our government. And then most importantly say OK, and ask ourselves, in knowing this>> "What are We going to do about it to Protect Our Families?? </li>
</ul><ul style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"></ul><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; text-align: center;"><b> Here is my reply in an effort to present ALL the story of Conflict in Our Constitutional Rights</b></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">This is indeed some good reference material for supporting the principle of "<b>Due Process</b>" in our Family Court system. A principle not currently in place in our Family Court.</div><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">I hope those supporting the Parental Rights US Constitutional Amendment have used this as a Reference. See more on this Amendment>> </span><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Rights/index.htm" style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">http://nfpcar.org/Rights/index.htm</a><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> An Amendment which is in battle with the UN Children Rights Proposal. And, to date, the US hasn't accepted this Proposal.</span><b style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> "The United States government played an active role in the drafting of the Convention and signed it on 16 February 1995, but has <span style="color: #c00000;">not</span> ratified it.</b><sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-untreaty_0-7" style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_the_Child#cite_note-untreaty-0">[1]</a>"</b> </sup><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Link to more information>></span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_the_Child" style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Rights_of_the_Child</a><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Of course, then there is CAPTA. For the group here is the status of the 2010 update of CAPTA>> </span><a href="http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.3817:" style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.3817:</a><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> Sarcastically, I always add "New and Improved"</span><br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">So many conflicts that challenge our Rights as Parents for Our Children.</span></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Rights/makethecall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="271" src="http://nfpcar.org/Rights/makethecall.jpg" width="320" /></a></div></div><div style="color: blue; text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: small;"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;">"Sometimes it just takes one small voice to make a world of difference...<br />
I challenge you to be one of those voices"</span></b></span></i></div><b style="color: #000066; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">*Note: </b><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">PARENTING AS A PROTECTED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT <span style="font-size: x-small;">was authored by a civil rights</span></span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">attorney, as an argument in a case for a parent's rights. Currently it should not be using this argument at all (it is not a formal document, or is it a published article, just a part of someone's case). It is to show what a civil rights attorney wrote about parental rights, which is not one of our amendments, or BILL OF RIGHTS, as parental rights are implied in the 17th amendment.</span><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;"> </b></span><br />
<b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</b><img height="30" src="http://rscrapz.com/glasses.jpg" width="45" /><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">GranPa Chuck</b><br />
<b> Check Out Our Collectibles>></b> <a href="http://rscrapz.com/" target="_blank">http://rscrapz.com</a> <br />
<b> My Family Rights Affiliation>></b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm" target="_blank">http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm</a><br />
<b> Defend Yourself>><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img border="1" height="20" src="http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/Jurisdictionary.gif" width="124" /></a></span></b>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-69901431845808576482010-12-10T11:17:00.000-08:002010-12-10T11:17:20.740-08:00Judges Bench Book -- May be a Valuable Source of Information<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b> <a href="" name="Judges_Bench_Books"><span style="font-size: medium;">Judges Bench Books</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#Disclaimer:"><span style="color: red; font-size: x-small;">See Disclaimer</span></a></b></span></div><br />
<div align="center"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#Just_a_Thought">Just a Thought</a> </span></b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#Introductory_Reading"><span style="text-decoration: none;">~ </span>Introductory Reading</a> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#What_are_Judges_Bench_Books"> <span style="text-decoration: none;">~ </span>What are Judges Bench Books?</a> ~ <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#For_the_Judges_Bench_Guide_in_Your_State"> Judges Bench Guide in Your State</a></b></span></div><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span><br />
<br />
<div align="center"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="" name="Just_a_Thought">Just a Thought</a></span></b></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Judge Leonard Edwards wrote an article for the Judges Page on the National CASA website where he says that judges need to stop rubber stamping these cases and enforce the "<b>Reasonable Efforts</b>" requirement, but they are afraid a "No Reasonable Efforts" ruling could cost their state millions of dollars. There is also at least one Judges Bench Book (<a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#Custody_and_Visitation">California</a>) that is referred to as "<b><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm#Custody_and_Visitation">The Smoking Gun</a></b>" because it very clearly states that the courts MUST rule during the initial hearing (after removal) that it is contrary to the best interest of the child to be returned home, otherwise the state is NEVER eligible for federal funding. You can see it for yourself at <a href="http://www.thesociologycenter.com/EvidenceBooks/Bench%20Guides%20SmallFile.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;"> http://www.thesociologycenter.com/EvidenceBooks/Bench%20Guides%20SmallFile.pdf</a> on pages 2, 3 and 13.</span></div>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-3307398929575252112010-12-10T11:00:00.000-08:002010-12-10T11:11:27.702-08:00Bad Judges -- What to do About Them<div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">One of the many articles relating to Judges: (<a href="http:///#%20Judges%20Bench%20Books%20%20are%20the%20instruction%20manuals%20on%20how%20a%20Judge%20can%20or%20should%20rule%20and/or%20preside%20over%20a%20case.%20">Link: http://nfpcar.org/Legal/#Judge__Information</a> )</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">A related Link: </div><ul><li><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm">Judges Bench Books</a> <span style="font-size: x-small;"> are the instruction manuals on how a Judge can or should rule and/or preside over a case. </span></span></li>
</ul><br />
<div align="center"><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><b> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14pt;">BAD JUDGES and What to Do About Them***<br />
</span></b><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/Tips/Bad_Judge.htm#Disclaimer:"><span style="color: red; font-size: x-small;">See Disclaimer</span></a></b></span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><i> <span style="font-family: Arial;">Bad Judges exist.</span></i><span style="font-family: Arial;"> We all know they do. But very few practicing lawyers are willing or able to expose Bad Judges publicly, for they are at great risk when they must later appear again before the exposed Bad Judge. Exposure of rotten judicial apples offends and embarrasses the entire judiciary. When a lawyer, in diligent pursuit of his client's interests, dares stand up to Bad Judges, the "system" locks arms, and seeks to punish or suppress the iconoclastic lawyer. Yet someone must stand up to challenge this cancer within the Judiciary.</span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <a href="http://www.primenet.com/%7Enolawyer/rahbio.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank"> Attorney <span style="color: black; font-family: Arial; text-decoration: none;"> <i>Bob Hirschfeld</i></span></a> has done so repeatedly. The "system" has treated him brutally in retribution. He rises again today to challenge, and hopefully improve, the system. On July 7, 1995, Hirschfeld <a href="http://www.primenet.com/%7Enolawyer/independ.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank"> publicly burned his bar card on the steps of the Arizona Supreme Court building. On February 9, 1996, he declared his independence from the State Bar. </a></span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">But Hirschfeld still believes that the Bad Judges form only a minority, and need to be weeded out. It is to the great majority of <i>fair, competent judges</i> that the following is dedicated. </span></div><h2 align="justify"><i> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt;">What To Do About A Bad Judge</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></i> </h2><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">LEARN THE JUDGE'S RECORD Courtroom Monitoring, Case Research, Investigation, Ask local practitioners, Ask national court reform advocacy groups,</span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">New Judges with no track record - listen to other cases in their courtrooms before losing your right to disqualify, </span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">IDENTIFY AND PUBLICLY EXPOSE BIASED AND PREJUDICED JUDGES Early identification of a Bad Judge may be the single most important factor in your litigation. If it is too late to help in your own case, exposure helps prevent similar judicial abuse of subsequent litigants </span></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><b> <span style="font-family: Arial;">Before the trial:</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;">DISQUALIFICATION FOR CAUSE Example: <a href="http://www.primenet.com/%7Enolawyer/recusal.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank"> Motion for Recusal</a> </span></div><table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="MsoNormalTable" id="table3"><tbody>
<tr> <td style="padding: 0pt;" valign="top"><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br clear="all" /> </span></div></td> </tr>
</tbody></table><div align="center" class="h1" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://us.mc01g.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?.gx=1&.rand=1t38dkl0411uu#recusemot" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank"> <b><span style="font-family: Arial;">Motion for Recusal</span></b></a> </span></div><div align="justify" class="h4"><i><b> <span style="font-family: Arial;">Here is an example of an actual, public-record Motion for Recusal for Cause. It is dangerous to try such a motion unless there is a high probability of success (such success is unlikely, because judges rarely admit that their brethren are biased or prejudiced). If the motion is denied, one is stuck with not only a Bad Judge, but an angrier one.</span></b></i><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Case No. 85DR1167</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> __________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE STEINHARDT</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> __________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">In re the Marriage of</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">David L. Rose Petitioner</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">and,</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Mary L. Rose Respondent</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> __________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Comes now petitioner, David L. Rose, pro-se and moves to recuse the Honorable Joyce Steinhardt for the reasons that the said judge is biased and prejudiced against the petitioner and for the further reason that she is biased and prejudiced against males seeking custody, and for the further reason that she is biased and prejudiced against children in the context of custody cases, all as more particularly appears in the Affidavit of Bias and Prejudice submitted herewith.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> WHEREFORE, petitioner respectfully moves and prays that the Honorable Joyce Steinhardt remove and disqualify herself as judge, or that the instant motion be heard by a judge other than Judge Steinhardt pursuant to the doctrine of Johnson v. District Court, 674 P.2d 952 (1984), to the end that another judge be assigned to hear and try all matters in the instant case.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> This is the 22nd. day of July 1987</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ___________________________________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> David L. Rose</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Pro-se</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> (Address)</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Aurora, Colorado 80015</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> (303) (phone)</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> VERIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">STATE OF COLORADO )</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> : ss.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ) </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Before me, the undersigned authority, personally came and appeared the affiant named below, who, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposed and said that he has read the above and foregoing document and knows the contents thereof, and that all statements of fact contained therein are true.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> </span></b> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">This is the 22nd. Day of July 1987, </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> _________________________________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> AFFIANT</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Subscribed and sworn to before me, this _____ day of </span></b> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">July 1987.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ________________________________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> , NOTARY PUBLIC</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Address of notary:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> CERTIFICATE OF MAILING</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">I do hereby certify that the above foregoing MOTION was mailed postage</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">pre-paid by placing the same in a stamped envelope and placed in the United States mail, to the respondents last attorney of record and to</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">the GAL.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">xxxxxxxxxx</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">xxxxxxxxxxx</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Littleton, CO 80121</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">xxxxxxxxxxxxx</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Littleton, CO 80123</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Mailed this date__________________________.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ----------------------------------------</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">David L. Rose</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ========================================================</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Case No. 85DR1167</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> _________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ___________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">David L. Rose Petitioner</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">and,</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Mary L. Rose Respondent</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> __________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Comes now Petitioner, David L. Rose, pro-se, who, being first duly sworn, states that he believes the Honorable Steinhardt is biased and prejudiced against him personally, and against fathers seeking custody, and against fathers seeking significant involvement with their children and against children.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Petitioner is past president of Fathers For Equal Rights of Colorado, Executive Vice-President of The National Congress for Men, and editor of Fathers Network a magazine for Fathers involved in discriminatory divorces and has been an outspoken critic of Judge Steinhardt. </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The petitioner has been vocal in denouncing the decisions and the attitude of the Honorable Judge Steinhardt and has made these proclamations public.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The petitioner has initiated an independent evaluation of the Honorable Steinhardt's record in custody matters and has determined that her record clearly shows an extreme PREJUDICE against men and against pro-se litigants.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The effect of this exercise of petitioner's right to freedom of speech is to so prejudice Judge Steinhardt, an avowed advocate of feminist rights, against him that he cannot obtain a fair trial in her court.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The judge has been unnecessarily harsh on the petitioner in this matter and it has appeared to at least two other witnesses to her conduct that she has acted in a prejudicial fashion toward the petitioner. (Exhibits attached). Further the court has imposed such impossible financial burdens on the petitioner </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Accordingly, affiant moves and prays that the Honorable Joyce Steinhardt be disqualified from further proceedings in this matter. </span></b> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> This is the 22nd. day of July, 1987.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> </span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> VERIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">STATE OF COLORADO )</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ss.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Before me, the undersigned authority, personally came and appeared the affiant named below, who, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposed and said that he has read the above and foregoing document and knows the contents thereof, and that all statements of fact contained therein are true.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> This is the 22ND. day of July 1987, at Denver, Colorado.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> __________________________________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> AFFIANT</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 15th day of </span></b> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">July 1987, at Denver, Colorado. My commission expires _________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> --------------------------</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> NOTARY PUBLIC</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Address of notary:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> CERTIFICATE OF MAILING</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Case No. 85DR1167</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> _________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE STEINHARDT</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ___________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">In re the Marriage of:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">David L. Rose Petitioner</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">and,</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">Mary L. Rose Respondent</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> _________________________________________________________</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> This motion by David L. Rose, Pro-se to recuse Judge Steinhardt is governed by Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 97.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The question is not whether the Honorable Joyce Steinhardt is impartial in fact, but rather whether reasonable men might question her impartiality under all circumstances. United States v. Gigax, 605 F.2d 507 (10th Cir. 1979).</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing before a judge other than Judge Steinhardt, at which hearing he may adduce evidence to show that Judge Steinhardt is prejudiced against outspoken advocates of equal rights for fathers, including the petitioner.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The instant motion must be heard by a judge other than Judge Steinhardt. The case of Johnson v. District Court, 674 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1984) is apposite. In that case, the Supreme Court said:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Where an attorney for one of the litigants signs a verified</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> affidavit alleging conduct and statements on the part of a</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";">trial judge which, if true, shows bias and prejudice or the</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> appearance of bias or prejudice on the part of the trial</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> judge, </span></b><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";">it is an abuse of discretion if that judge does not</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> withdraw from the case, even though he or she believes the statements are false or that the meaning attributed to them by the party seeking recusal is erroneous. In such a case, the judge should not pass</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";">upon the truth or falsity of the facts alleged in the affidavit, but only upon the dequacy of the motion as a matter of law.</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> In another case as reported in the Colorado Lawyer; Wright vs. District Court, 16 Colorado Lawyer 541, March 1987 the court ruled that:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> The fact that Judge Goldsmith in his own mind does not believe that he is prejudiced against Wright and his firm does not prevent disqualification if the motions and affidavits reflect prejudice and an appearance of impropriety.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">The Supreme Court went on to say:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Once facts have been set forth that create a reasonable inference of a "bent of mind" that will prevent the judge from dealing fairly with the party seeking recusal, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to recuse himself. See People v. Botham, 629 P.2d 589, 595 (Colo. 1981); C.J.C. Canon 3(C)(1). A trial judge must accept the affidavits filed with the motion as true, even though the judge believes that the statements contained in the affidavits are false or that the meaning attributed to them by the party seeking recusal is erroneous. Johnson v. District Court, 674 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1982). </span></b></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> C.R.C.P. 97 provides:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> "A judge shall be disqualified in an action in which he is interested or prejudiced, or has been of counsel for any party,</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span><b><span style="font-family: "Courier New";">or is or has been a material witness, or is so related or connected with any party of his attorney as to render it improper for him to sit on the trial, appeal, or other proceeding therein. A judge may disqualify himself on his own motion for any of said reasons or any party may move for such disqualification and a motion by a party for disqualification shall be supported by affidavit. Upon the filing by a party of such a motion all other proceedings in the case shall be suspended until a ruling is made thereon. Upon disqualifying himself, a judge shall notify forthwith the chief judge of the district who shall assign another judge in the district to hear the action. If no other judge in the district is available or qualified, the chief judge shall notify forthwith the court administrator who shall obtain from the Chief Justice the assignment of a replacement judge."</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">We said in Johnson v. District Court, 674 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1984):</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> "Ordinarily, the question of whether a judge should be disqualified in a civil case is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. In re Marriage of Mann, 655 P.2d 814 (Colo. 1982). However, where an attorney for one of the litigants signs a verified affidavit alleging conduct and statements on the part of a trial judge which, if true, show bias or prejudice or the appearance of bias or prejudice on the part of the trial judge, it is an abuse of discretion if that judge does not withdraw from the case, even though he or she believes the statements are false or that the meaning attributed to them by the party seeking recusal is erroneous. In such a case, the judge should not pass upon the truth or falsity of the facts alleged in the affidavit, but only upon the adequacy of the of the motion as a matter of law. 'The motion and supporting affidavit speak for themselves and the only question involved is whether the facts alleged are sufficient to compel the judge to disqualify himself.' Kovacheff v Langhart, 147 Colo. 339, 343-44, 363 P.2d 702, 705 (1961). The motion and affidavits are legally adequate if they 'state facts from which it may reasonably be inferred that the judge has bias or prejudice that will prevent him from dealing fairly' with the party seeking recusal. People v. Botham, 629 P.2d 589, 595 (Colo. 1981)."</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Because the act of appearing Pro-se, installs and grants an individual under the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the State of Colorado, full authority to act as an officer of the court in all matters both civil and criminal, it therefore stands to reason that an affidavit signed by an individual, pro-se and substantiated by others who were witness to the event, should bear up as having the same weight as an affidavit signed by an attorney for a litigant.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">It therefore stand to reason that:</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span> </div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> "A judge must grant a motion for disqualification if the motion and supporting affidavits state facts from which it reasonably may be inferred that the judge has a bias or prejudice that will prevent him from dealing fairly with the party seeking recusal. The judge must accept the affidavits filed with the motion as true even though the judge believes that the statements contained in the affidavits are false."</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> </span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Respectfully it is submitted that the Honorable Joyce Steinhardt must be disqualified from the above numbered and entitled action.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Respectfully submitted this 22nd.., day of July 1987.</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> </span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> ______________________________________</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> David L. Rose</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> (address).</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> Aurora, Colorado 80015</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> (303) (phone)</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> </span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";"> CERTIFICATE OF MAILING</span></b><span style="font-family: inherit;"> </span></div><div align="justify" class="preformatted"><b> <span style="font-family: "Courier New";">(same as first example)</span></b></div><div align="justify" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">***(More to Come—Information Submitted by Charles Harman)</span></div></div><div align="center"></div><div align="left"><span style="color: red; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=330739892957525211" name="Disclaimer:"> Disclaimer:</a> This is for informational purposes only. We are not lawyers or affilated with any lawyers shown. It the the responsiblity of the user to check the accuracy and validity of this information.</span></div><div align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>If you are interested in joining our support group, use the link below to subscribe. </b></span></div><br />
<center><form action="http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/fosterparentallegations" method="GET"><table bgcolor="#ffffcc" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" id="table1"><tbody>
<tr><td align="center" colspan="2"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>Subscribe to fosterparentallegations</b> </span></td></tr>
<tr><td><span style="font-family: Arial;"><input name="user" size="20" type="text" value="enter email address" /> </span></td><td><span style="font-family: Arial;"><input alt="Click here to join fosterparentallegations" border="0" name="Click here to join fosterparentallegations" src="http://groups.yahoo.com/img/ui/join.gif" type="image" /> </span></td></tr>
<tr align="center"><td colspan="2"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Powered by <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/">groups.yahoo.com</a> </span></td></tr>
</tbody></table></form></center><br />
<div align="center"><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">God Bless, GranPa Chuck<br />
<a href="http://nfpcar.org/rWeb/index.html">Weekend WebMaster</a></span></b></div>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-48501678064407090732010-12-10T09:34:00.000-08:002010-12-10T09:39:22.522-08:00Finding the Right Lawyer<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: left;">Here is just one of the many links you will find on the web page relating to your lawyer. Perhaps the most important thing to do is to find a lawyer who will truly fight the agency. Or know as Goliath.(Link: <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #00b050;"><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/#Lawyer_Information">http://nfpcar.org/Legal/#Lawyer_Information) </a></span></span></span></span>Although this particular article is related to Administrative Hearings, there are many points to remember if you are in the Family Court or even Criminal Court Setting.<br />
Or, if you are brave enough and do your homework, you may even want to defend yourself: <b>Defend Yourself>><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img border="1" height="20" src="http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/Jurisdictionary.gif" width="124" /></a></span></b></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #00b050;"><span style="font-size: small;">____________________________________ </span></span></span></span></div><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #00b050;"><b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="Questions_You_Want_to_Ask"> Questions You Want to Ask</a> Your Lawyer</b></span></span></span></div><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: center;"><span style="color: navy; font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Questions">Questions</a><span class="smalltype"> ~</span><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Additional_Comments">Additional Comments</a><span class="smalltype"> ~<a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Related_Information">Related Information</a> -<a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#The_Lighter_Side_of_When_You_Need_a_Lawyer">The Lighter Side</a></span></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: navy;">The information given below is from members in our </span> <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fosterparentallegations/" style="color: navy; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank">Yahoo Foster Parent Allegations Group</a><span style="color: navy;">. If you have any addition comments, please let me know, </span> <a href="mailto:chuck@rscraps.com?subject=Questions%20to%20Ask%20Your%20Lawyer" style="color: navy; text-decoration: underline;"> GranPa Chuck</a><span style="color: navy;"> (Please note: you will see CPS, DCF, etc. There may be other logo letters used for your state. In essence, it is the government agency that is responsible for families and children.) </span> </span></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The very first thing you need to remember that YOU ARE DOING THE INTERVIEWING not the other way around. You are hiring him/her to represent you, not the other way around. Just because they are designated as an Administrative Law Attorney, does not necessarily mean that they have handled this type of case. As Administrative Law Attorneys, they may have handled cases for policeman, fireman, or a teacher, who are all under Administrative Law....but they may not have represented a foster parent and so may not have been up against CPS before. SO ASK.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">These questions will let you know whether you are dealing with an attorney who is sharp and aware of what is going on behind the scenes and is working with a full deck, sharp, and well aware of what is going on around him/her or not. You want an aggressive lion that is not afraid of the big bad wolf, (CPS); one who is not afraid to WIN; and make fools of this powerful enemy. This is what you need.</span></div><h2 style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="Questions">Questions</a></h2><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Questions that you may want to ask any attorney, while interviewing them, are these; </span></div><ol start="1" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;" type="1"><li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700;"><span style="font-size: small;">Have you ever handled a case against CPS before? If so, what was the outcome?</span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700;"><span style="font-size: small;">Have you ever worked for any department of CPS before?</span></span></li>
</ol><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial;">A member from Florida states, most of the attorneys, at least the ones we have found in the Tampa area, will go to bat with DCF. That is why they furthered their education. I think the plan was to help families. However after being involved with DCF on the other end, several attorneys have told us DCF is a hard nut to crack and these cases can be costly.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial;">I would like to know how well some attorneys know the Judges that are hearing the family cases. That is why I asked another member who she is working with. Any time we find an attorney in Central Florida, who is willing to go up against DCF, we want to add them to a list. There are two so far. Her attorney may not be good at Administrative Law but he sounds like he understood her issues with DCF. </span></div><ol start="3" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-top: 0in;" type="1"><li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700;"><span style="font-size: small;">Do you find it harder, or different in any way, to prepare for a case in an Administrative Inquiry/Hearing setting that a ordinary court of law? (Making sure that he/she understands the differences between the two). </span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700;"><span style="font-size: small;">What judges within the system do you recommend that we try to obtain to hear my case for _*fairness and justice*_ in the decisions rendered?</span></span></li>
</ol><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: navy; font-family: Arial;">In most cases an attorney is aware of the judges that hear particular types of cases, ie; family court where divorce involving custody/disputes/child support etc. and in other particular divisions like Administrative Law or juvenile justice systems. So they are somewhat familiar with court rulings and the leanings that particular judges have and any prejudices that those judges have; ie "*_the hanging judge_"* that hates husbands who don't pay child support who commonly throw the book at them and/or send them to jail, etc. They normally try to steer clear of this particular judge if they are presenting a child support case and representing a husband who is in arrears in child support. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Questions_You_Want_to_Ask">Back to Top</a></span></div><h2 style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="Additional_Comments">Additional Comments</a><br />
<span style="font-style: normal; font-weight: 400;"> <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fosterparentallegations/"> <span style="font-size: x-small;">from a Group Member</span></a></span></h2><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">I have some ideas since I have represented people at Administrative Hearings. Since I am a paralegal, I am allowed to do that. I found it frustrating having an attorney at our hearing since we have to talk to him about everything until we testified. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The big problem I see with representing yourself is DCFS has all our taxpayers money at their disposal and (here in Illinois, anyway) often have two attorneys. With our hearing it did get narrowed down to one. The one quit in the middle of our hearing. I think she saw what was coming and didn't want to be a part of it. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The one I did in Central Illinois, the lady did not get the decision overturned. However, you can't believe the stuff that went on while she was out of the room. The judge and DCFS attorney actually discussed in front of me how they were trying to talk someone into saying things (obviously not true) to win their case. I still have notes of exactly what they said. They tried very hard to intimidate me and even sent me a letter saying I couldn't be on the telephone conference because they heard someone in the background, and the hearings are supposed to be confidential. It was my 10-year old son who could care less about what was being said. Consequently, I didn't get to finish the hearings. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Before hiring an attorney for our hearings, I talked and interviewed three different attorneys. I knew this attorney had to be knowledgeable and aggressive. This attorney had worked in the public defenders office and had a lot of dealings with DCFS. He did a great job even though we didn't get the decision overturned. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">A good law judge will listen to evidence on both sides and not allow further evidence to be entered. Our judge did exactly that. It didn't give our attorney a chance to ask us what really happened. I think it is very difficult to have a fair judge when they are hired by DCFS. One DCFS attorney openly flirted with the judge during our hearing (the one who quit). The hearing should have been ended. I didn't know as much then as I do now, but I think in retrospect we should have asked for a new law judge. It's just that our hearing lasted 345 days as it was, and we were tired of it all. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> I don't know if this helps you much, but I sure did see what a law judge should NOT be.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Questions_You_Want_to_Ask">Back to Top</a></span></div><h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span class="smalltype"> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="Related_Information">Related Information</a></span></h2><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerHelp.htm">Helping Your Lawyer</a></span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/references">Law Index State to State</a></span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/Tips/index.htm">Tips and Tactics</a> </span><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Introduction into the Court System</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: medium;"> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="The_Lighter_Side_of_When_You_Need_a_Lawyer">The Lighter Side of When You Need a Lawyer</a></span></b></div><div style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>I always have 3 signs you need a lawyer.</b><br />
<br />
1) The other guy has one.<br />
2) The other side says you don't need a lawyer.<br />
3) The other side says just sign it, its a formality.<br />
<br />
A supposed quote of Danny De Vito's character in Other Peoples Money, "I have<br />
lawyers for the same reason people have nuclear weapons. The other guy has<br />
them."<br />
<br />
<b>The real quote:</b><br />
<br />
<b>Kate Sullivan</b>: Well, for someone who has nothing nice to say about lawyers, you<br />
certainly have plenty of them around.<br />
<b>Lawrence Garfield</b>: They're like nuclear warheads. They have theirs, so I have<br />
mine. Once you use them, they f* up everything.</span></div><div align="left" class="MsoBodyTextIndent"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm#Questions_You_Want_to_Ask">Back to Top</a></span> <b> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">OR</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <a href="http://rscraps.com/NFPCAR/Legal/index.htm#Index_to_Legal_Assistance">Back to Legal Assistance Index</a></span></div><div align="justify"><br />
</div><div align="center"><table border="1" id="table1"><tbody>
<tr> <td><div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <b><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Presenedt by:<br />
</span></b><a href="http://nfpcar.org/NFPCAR"> <img border="0" height="50" src="http://nfpcar.org/images/nfpcarlogo5.gif" width="75" /></a><br />
<a href="http://nfpcar.org/NFPCAR"> <img border="0" height="50" src="http://nfpcar.org/images/nfpcarhead.gif" width="207" /></a></span></div></td> </tr>
</tbody></table></div><div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: xx-small;">Copyright </span> <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">© 2002</span></span></div><div align="center"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/index.htm"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Return to eBook Index</span></a></div><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span><br />
<div align="center"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ </span></b></div><div align="center"><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=4850167806440709073" name="Lawyer_Information">Lawyer Information</a></span></b></div><ul><li><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerFind.htm">Questions You Want to Ask Your Lawyer</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/LawyerHelp.htm" target="_blank">Helping Your Lawyer</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Simple Justice <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/">http://blog.simplejustice.us/</a> " <b>Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice. This is free. Legal advice you have to pay for."</b></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/#Intro_Page_from_Fight_CPS">Comments & Additional Links to Lawyers</a> </span> <span style="color: cyan; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <span style="background-color: #cccccc;">(from <a href="http://fightcps.com/" target="_blank">FightCPS.com</a>)</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://rscraps.com/NFPCAR/Lawyer/">Recommendations of Lawyers in your state</a> If you know of a lawyer and/or need a lawyer, please <a href="mailto:chuck@rscraps.com?subject=Lawyer%20Information">email</a> so we can check this information. <span style="color: navy; font-size: x-small;">(<b>Note</b>: You will be directed to our rScrapZ.com/NFPCAR site)</span> We currently have this information Password Protected. Also please be aware, when using this information: </span> <span style="color: red; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">This is for informational purposes only. We are not lawyers or affiliated with any lawyers shown. It the the responsibility of the user to check the accuracy and validity of this information.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Lawyer Ethics - Coming Soon - It is difficult enough to find a lawyer to truly help you. However, lawyers have certain guidelines that they should follow. This page shall contain links and comments on these ethics. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/eBook/Lawyer_Pro_Se.htm">More Litigants Go To Court Without Lawyers</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: navy;"> If you are brave check out this </span> <a href="http://www.americanprosesociety.com/" target="_blank"> <span style="color: navy;">Pro Se WebSite.</span></a><span style="color: navy;"> or Check the <a href="http://victimsoflaw.net/ProSeNewsViews.htm" target="_blank">Pro Se News</a>. Please note, we always suggest that you seek Legal Advice.</span></span></li>
</ul><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/#Index_to_Legal_Assistance">Back to Index</a></span><span style="color: navy; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-61657237757203780002010-12-04T11:18:00.000-08:002010-12-04T13:59:10.457-08:00Unintentional Accidents of Children~Can they be prevented?<div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The following article made the statement "....<span style="color: black;"><b>and yet every unintentional injury is preventable</b>...." </span></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;">Most kids are adventurous and curious.. And actually, we might even need to watch them 24/7.. But is that possible??? Still, I encourage everyone who cares for our children to check this out.. Might even contain a hint that you didn't even think about to make Your Family Safe.</span></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;">Here is the Intro Paragraph:</span></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;">____________________________</span></div><div style="color: blue; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">"As parents, caregivers, and educators, we all work so hard to keep children safe every day. Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 14, and yet every unintentional injury is preventable. We cannot be with our children every step of the way, but we can create safe environments for them, and educate ourselves on how to keep them safe even when we are not around. Here at Safe Kids it is our job to create more awareness around injury prevention in order to prevent further injuries and deaths."</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;">_____________________________</span></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: black;">Read More and Possibly answer the questions>> <a href="http://sk.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=29821&em_id=32721.0">http://sk.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=29821&em_id=32721.0</a></span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Finally, on may ask, "Why do I even bring this up?</span><br />
<span style="color: black;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Here is just one of my late wife's Gloria and my story in our journey through life. As Foster Care Givers, we were caring for a very active 3 year old. One day, in her bedroom she climbed on top of her dresser and fell. She hit her eye lid on the way down. At that time, my daughter, a nurse, checked her out. We also watched the little 3 year old for possible signs of concussion symptoms. No symptoms were apparent.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Then one day, out of the blue, we were presented with a document from our agency of a "Child Abuse" allegation due to the slightly bruised eye of the 3 year old... And also 12 other charges of possible abuse and/or policy violations. We did go to an Administrative hearing and were relieved of all abuse allegations and most of the policy violations.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;">So like I stated in the beginning accidents will happen.. But one must confirm the accident with a Trusted Doctor or Medical Aide. Even though, those close to you know it was an accident.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;">Oh, did I mention, due to a past study, Veterinarians are now Mandated Reporters in most states.</span><br />
<span style="color: black;"> </span><br />
<span style="color: black;">So again, please read the page, and possible sign up following this link>> </span><span style="color: black;"> <a href="http://sk.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=29821&em_id=32721.0">http://sk.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=29821&em_id=32721.0</a></span></div><div><span style="color: blue;">May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</span> <br />
<span style="color: blue;"><a href="http://rscrapz.com/rWeb/">Granpa Chuck</a></span> <br />
<span style="color: blue;">Keeper of the web files for <a href="http://nfpcar.org/">http://nfpcar.org</a></span></div><span style="color: black;"></span><span style="color: black;"></span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-23827074785236603842010-11-03T12:13:00.000-07:002010-11-03T12:15:02.063-07:00Again, So where is Our Bailout!!!!!<div style="color: blue; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">In a recent weekly email from Judical Watch goes into detail about the Bailouts. And one my want to subscribe to the newsletter. Each and every one of us "Common Folk" need to be aware of all the "Goliaths" out there taking Our HARD Earned money. (Link to site: <a href="https://www.judicialwatch.org/"><b>https://www.judicialwatch.org</b></a>/ )</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</span></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"></div><div style="color: black; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;"><i>'The Wall Street Journal</i> on JW’s Bailout Lawsuit</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><i>The Wall Street Journal</i> stated something in a lead editorial this week that Judicial Watch knows all too well: “On the key facts behind the bailouts of 2008, regulators have stonewalled the public, the press and even the inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.”</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Judicial Watch is leading a focused and aggressive campaign to uncover the truth about the government’s massive bailout scheme. And, in fact, much of the <i>Journal</i> piece focused on a series of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits we have filed on behalf of former FDIC employee Vern McKinley.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Here’s a squib from <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=9903570&msgid=196263&act=K98N&c=157205&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748703467004575463781244452958.html" target="_blank">the editorial</a>:</div><blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">A year ago we told you about former FDIC official Vern McKinley, who has made a series of Freedom of Information Act requests. He wanted to know what Fed governors meant when they said a Bear Stearns failure would cause a "contagion." This term was used in the minutes of the Fed meeting at which the central bank discussed plans by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to finance Bear's sale to J.P. Morgan Chase. The minutes contained no detail on how exactly the fall of Bear would destroy America. </blockquote><blockquote style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">He also requested minutes of the FDIC board meeting at which regulators approved financing for a Citigroup takeover of Wachovia. To provide this assistance, the board had to invoke the "systemic risk" exception in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and it therefore had to assert that such assistance was necessary for the health of the financial system. <b>Yet days later, Wachovia cut a better deal to sell itself to <span class="il">Wells</span> <span class="il">Fargo</span>, instead of Citi.</b><br />
So how necessary was the assistance?</blockquote><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">That’s exactly what we intend to find out about the federal government’s bailouts. And we’re not only looking at Bear Stearns and Citigroup. We have FOIA requests and lawsuits involving Bank of America, AIG, Lehman Brothers and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (Our client, Vern McKinley, sounded the alarm on Fannie and Freddie all the way back in 1997, but no one in Congress was listening.)</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">So we’re now trillions of dollars into these bailouts and the American people remain completely in the dark as to why they were necessary. Or even <i>if</i> they were necessary.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>The Bush and Obama administrations</b>, as to be expected, have been reluctant to shed light on these issues. Still, we have managed to unearth some key government bailout documents.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">For example, Judicial Watch forced the release of <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=9903570&msgid=196263&act=K98N&c=157205&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.judicialwatch.org%2Fnews%2F2009%2Fsep%2Fjw-uncovers-documents-treasury-related-government-brokered-acquisition-bear-stearns-jp" target="_blank">Treasury Department emails</a> related to the government-brokered acquisition of Wall Street firm Bear Stearns by JP Morgan. According to these documents, JP Morgan officials believed Bear Stearns to be "nearly worthless" just hours before the acquisition deal was announced. Nonetheless, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (NY FRB) supported the deal with $30 billion in funding at the direction of then-Treasury Secretary Henry “Hank” Paulson.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Why did the government believe the collapse of Bear Stearns would cause a “contagion” in the financial markets? And why did Paulson think it necessary to “invest” $30 billion in taxpayer dollars to support the purchase of a “worthless” company? To date, we have no explanation.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">In an interview for Judicial Watch’s monthly newsletter, <i>The Verdict</i>, Mr. McKinley said he doesn’t buy the government’s “contagion” theory. He believes government officials were “flying by the seat of their pants” during the financial crisis. They seemingly had little understanding of how investment banks worked, yet they were absolutely certain that there were companies that were “too big to fail.”</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">The response by the government’s financial agencies to the crisis set into motion a massive expansion of the size and scope of the federal government from which we may never recover. When President Obama took office, he doubled down on the Bush administration’s gamble and now we have a federal government with unprecedented command and control of an economy still in tatters, and virtually no answers from our leaders in government as to how we got here.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Developments in our investigations and litigation are fast-breaking, and I expect to have more for you over the next few weeks."</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</b><img height="30" src="http://rscrapz.com/glasses.jpg" width="45" /><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">GranPa Chuck</b><br />
<b> Check Out Our Collectibles>></b> <a href="http://rscrapz.com/" target="_blank">http://rscrapz.com</a> <br />
<b> My Family Rights Affiliation>></b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm" target="_blank">http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm</a><br />
<b> Defend Yourself>><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img border="1" height="20" src="http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/Jurisdictionary.gif" width="124" /></a></span></b><br />
</div>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-8835754031754961342010-10-29T23:44:00.000-07:002010-10-29T23:44:59.532-07:00Justice on Trial!!!!<span style="color: blue;">~~~~Passing on a Patriotic Note from Jurisdictionary~~~~</span><br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 405px;"><tbody>
<tr> <td> Sure, we have problems. BIG PROBLEMS. It's impossible to open your eyes and not see our American Way of Life is threatened with New Speak, New Thought, and the threat of a New World Order that seeks to centralize all power in the hands of a few atheist globalists who will enslave all of humanity under an iron fist ... <b><em>if we let them!</em></b><span style="border-bottom: 2px dotted rgb(239, 239, 239); color: #0000cc; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 6px;"><img align="right" alt="Win with Jurisdictionary!" height="153" src="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/CFMail/Images/Arrest.gif" width="152" /></span><br />
<br />
Our traditional American values of self-reliance, hard work, honesty in business, and genuine patriotism that works to promote liberty by working for justice according to the Rule of Law and the principles and practices of due process are still the only protection we have for ourselves and our children.<br />
<br />
Individual rights are disappearing from our land ... paving the way for One World Government ...<em> if we do nothing.</em><br />
<em>Only if we do nothing!</em><br />
<br />
<strong>You need positive answers ... not more warnings or insane legal theories that don't work!</strong><br />
You and your neighbors need to know how to FIX what's wrong, how to force our leaders to do what's right, how to restore the American Dream for yourselves, your children, and future generations.<br />
<strong>I have good news for this bad news age!</strong><br />
Please read to the end of this Tips & Tactics. Forward it to your friends. And send me an email explaining where you stand ... <em>and if you stand with me!</em><br />
<br />
These past few weeks I've waded through an alarming increase of emails complaining about the failing economy, crooked banks, and corrupt government leaders.<br />
<br />
So, it seemed right for me to remind you again,<strong> there is hope for those willing to <em>FIGHT</em> <em>SMART!</em></strong><br />
<br />
My in-box is flooded every day (and more of late) by folks I call <em>pseudo patriots </em>who insist the end is near. They may be well-meaning, and the points they make are often valid, <em>but they aren't offering any practical solutions!</em><br />
<br />
Complaining about a fox in the henhouse doesn't do a thing for the poor defenseless chickens, yet day-after-day I receive more and more from these well-meaning people who seem to think by pointing their fingers at the problem and urging all their friends to recognize the problem (as if we all didn't see the problems already) that their efforts will somehow magically make the problem go away.<br />
'Tain't so!<br />
<br />
If you want the fox out of the henhouse, and voting at the polling booth now-and-then doesn't seem to be making much of a change for the better, then it's time to <strong>get your pen and start putting ink on paper!</strong><br />
<br />
Ooops! Did you expect me to suggest violence? Not a chance. That's not what America is all about. We are a people (or, at least, we once were) dedicated to order, due process, and a peaceful resolution to our difficulties.<br />
<strong>That means ink on paper!</strong><br />
<br />
Complaining gets us nowhere, unless we complain with a "Complaint" filed at the local courthouse - 'cause that does wonders when it's done properly.<br />
<br />
If you don't believe me, look at the world around you and see for yourself how much of what we have today (good and bad) resulted from the decisions of courts.<br />
<br />
The <em>pseudo patriots</em> have only bad news and wacky ideas about how to fix our problems ... ideas that are putting quite a few people behind bars, I might add.<br />
<strong>I have good news! </strong><br />
We live in an age of opportunity such as the world has never seen before. When I entered the practice of law nearly a quarter-century ago, we didn't have computers to do on-line legal research. If we had a legal problem, there was only one solution: hire a lawyer. And, if you are like I was 30 years ago, you don't have tens of thousands of dollars to pay some lawyer who may end up dropping the ball or screwing your life up because of his or her stupid incompetence, laziness, or fear of the judge. Back then, it was either pay through the nose <em>... or lose!</em><br />
<strong>That was before <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a>.</strong><br />
If you already have my course, read on to see how <em>you </em>can be part of the solution for our nation's ill. If you don't already have my course, r<strong>ead the testimonials! ⇒</strong> <br />
Our nation is threatened with a great calamity at this hour, and the cause may surprise you. Our very way of life is on trial. If "We the People" do not learn how to put ink on paper and take advantage of the power of our courts, we may soon be looking back at the "good old days" and wishing we'd done what we could while there was time to do it right.<br />
Meanwhile, instead of encouraging you to learn the rules of court and how to use them to <strong>Restore the Republic </strong>the "right way" (abiding by the principles of our democratic republic) the <em>pseudo patriots </em>are leading many of you down a path to certain destruction. They are so busy finding fault while teaching their idiotic ideas about how greedy people can escape justice by claiming nonsense defenses, that good people like you are confused about where to turn for the "right way" to get justice.<br />
<strong>We are a nation of laws!</strong><br />
True patriots work with wisdom to control corrupt judges and legislators to change bad laws, instead of trying to find novel ways to get around the law for their own advantage.<br />
True patriots seek justice according to the rules!<br />
Today's <em>pseudo patriots</em> have lost their way. Don't let them turn you from the "right way" with their proclamations of doom or confuse you into trying to win in court by saying you are not WHO YOU ARE if your name is in all capital letters, or any of the similar nonsense they sell.<br />
<strong>We can turn this nation around if we work together!</strong><br />
We can force judges to follow the rules. We can turn crooked lawyers out-on-their-ear! We can overcome even the most powerful opponent the "right way", peaceably, according to law and order - instead of being "outlaws" trying to wiggle out of our troubles with stupid tricks.<br />
If it weren't so easy to learn the official rules there'd be no hope for us. But, it IS EASY to learn the rules <em>and how to use them to force people in powerful positions to do what's right!</em><br />
The <em>pseudo patriots </em>are so obsessed with the admittedly serious problems we face at this hour they do not see that the solution is already in our own hands: The Law!<br />
We can put the law to work the "right way", using the "official rules" that overcome corrupt judges and defeat crooked lawyers and make justice possible for anyone of average intelligence willing to make an effort to learn how the legal game is played to win!<br />
<strong>We must all stop staring at the darkness and lift the lamp of liberty and justice while there is yet time!</strong><br />
<em>P</em><em>seudo patriots</em> find fault with America and her system of law and order, but that's all they do. <br />
The only answer <em>pseudo patriots</em> offer is to "spread the word", as if telling everyone what's wrong will magically make things right once again! <br />
It is madness!<span style="border-bottom: 2px dotted rgb(239, 239, 239); color: #0000cc; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 6px;"><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img align="right" alt="Learn from Jurisdictionary step-by-step" border="0" height="100" hspace="4" src="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Images/Animated/FreeTalkBanner.gif" vspace="4" width="125" /></a></strong></span><br />
They say they are "patriots", but they don't tell you how to save your nation. They're too busy telling you what's wrong, who's at fault, and how ugly things will be when their terrible predictions come true. <br />
Their message is <em>all negative!</em><br />
And, when they do offer their theories about what it takes to get justice, their theories are nothing short of lunacy!<br />
<ul><li>Fringe on the courtroom flag</li>
<li>Name in all caps isn't them</li>
<li>Copyrighting their own name</li>
<li>Even disavowing their citizenship!</li>
</ul>The list is nearly endless ... and totally insane!<br />
<strong>The power to control corrupt government officials, crooked banks, and anyone else who violates the law contrary to our American Principles IS in the courts!</strong><br />
This is YOUR POWER!<br />
Use it!<br />
Use if for yourselves and for the sake of your children and future generations ... <em>while there is yet time!</em><br />
<strong>YOUR POWER <em>IS</em> IN THE COURTS!</strong><br />
All you have to do is learn how to use the courts and urge EVERYONE you meet to learn how also!<br />
Together we can use the Rule of Law to protect the Rule of Law and deliver to future generations a nation that's far better than the one we received from this generation of greedy vipers and fools.<br />
Rather than joining <em>pseudo patriots </em>who proclaim, "The sky is falling," while urging you to "copyright your name" and offer similar nonsense solutions born out of fear and paranoia, <strong>you and your children can learn how to do what every American is called to do at this hour!</strong><br />
<em><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Control the courts!</strong></a></em><br />
Look back to recent history to see how previous patriots fought in the courts to make <em>your </em>life better, safer, richer.<br />
Look what you have today and what they had then.<br />
When my dad was a boy, children under the age of 10 were forced to work 12-15 hour days in sweat shops. If you didn't have milky-white skin, you sat in the back of the bus, drank from designated water coolers, and were lucky to make 10-cents an hour for your labor. Women could not vote. By far the vast majority could forget about owning a home in a nice part of town. Health care was available only for the wealthy. Medicine was an amateur profession, killing people more often than healing them. <br />
When I was a born in 1943, children with their mothers, fathers, and grandparents were herded into gas chambers to die. Millions of them. While true patriots gave their lives to stop <em>the madness that always results when a nation loses sight of its soul.</em><br />
<em><strong>Is American losing sight of her soul?</strong></em><br />
Some people reading this will say, "The courts are <em>all </em>corrupt. The global conspiracy intends to murder all who resist and enslave the rest of us. The only hope we have is armed rebellion."<br />
<strong>These people are NOT true patriots!</strong><br />
True patriots work for The Rule of Law, fight for it, and are willing to die for it, because <strong>The Rule of Law is what this nation is all about and without it and the principles of due process that make The Rule of Law possible, the dreadful predictions of the <em>pseudo-patriots</em> will surely come to pass!</strong><br />
But, there is hope ... if YOU are willing to learn!<br />
There is hope ... if YOU are willing to teach others!<br />
<strong>You can still be heard ... <em>each and every one of you!</em></strong><br />
<strong>You can still make a difference for good!</strong><br />
Not by carrying signs in the street. Not by writing emails to warn your friends of the evils of the New World Order. And, certainly, not by dusting off your squirrel gun or arguing that your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS isn't you!<br />
<strong>You can ALL be Patriots ... and make a difference!</strong><br />
This nation was designed by some very clever people who recognized that the executive and legislative branches must be constrained and kept in check by the third branch of our government - <em>the courts! </em><br />
<strong>Courts are the lynch-pin of our legal heritage.</strong><br />
Yet, the legal profession has hidden from you the very simple process called litigation that even at this hour offers the American People all the power we need to stop the madness of this present age!<br />
<strong>I believe in the American People.</strong><br />
But, we should all fear what can happen if the American People listen to the <em>pseudo patriots </em>and decide it's too late to work <em>within</em> the law to change the law!<br />
If you want to identify the REAL PROBLEM we face in our nation today it is that the "legal profession" has hidden from The People (you and your loved ones) the simplicity that makes it possible for each and every one of you to petition your local courts for redress of your grievances.<br />
Because you don't know how easy it is to bring your petitions to court, to call witnesses, to present evidence, and to move judges to enter orders that can change your world for the better, you (and the rest of our population) are beginning to believe you cannot get justice without an impossibly expensive lawyer!<br />
<strong>This is a lie!</strong><br />
As many of you have unpleasantly discovered, not all lawyers are willing to <em>fight</em> for your rights - if you don't have scads of money to pay them, or if standing up to the judges might jeopardize their social or financial standing in the community. In the past 30 years lawyers converted a "profession" into just another "business", shamelessly advertising, making a mockery of common law and common sense by twisting reason beyond recognition. They will not teach you how to win in court, because then you'd know how to get justice without paying $400+/hour!<br />
<strong>But! The RULES OF JUSTICE are easy to learn!</strong><br />
YOU can learn them in less than 24 hours <em>step-by-step!</em><br />
Imagine a nation of courtroom soldiers fighting to restore our American Heritage. Not a cadre of professional lawyers but a "legal militia" of farmers, merchants, truck drivers, single moms, young couples just getting started, doctors, teachers, carpenters ... all knowledgeable in the methods of litigation, able to force judges to hear their causes, skilled in courtroom tactics, getting evidence on the record, moving judges for favorable orders that restore the American Way and the age-old hope of generations!<br />
<strong>You and your children have a choice:</strong><br />
<ul><li>You can listen to the pseudo patriots who say the end is near, that our system of justice is <em>completely </em>corrupt, that the only hope we have is trickery and violence, or</li>
<li>You can determine to work with your family and friends to learn and teach others The Rule of Law along with the simple principles and practices of due process that make controlling our courts easy enough for an 8th grader to understand and use.</li>
</ul><em>Together, you and I and all our friends can make a real and lasting difference in this nation and the world!</em><br />
Anyone can complain about what's wrong. Complaining and finding fault isn't patriotism. It's far from it!<br />
True patriots work for Justice <em>within the law </em>... instead of discouraging others by claiming, as so many <em>pseudo patriots</em> are heard to say these days, that all judges are orrupt, that justice in our courts is no longer possible.<br />
<strong>These people are NOT telling you the truth!</strong><br />
Take this to heart, my friends. Justice IS IMPOSSIBLE for those who refuse to learn how to get it ... <em>lawfully!</em><br />
If you care about our nation and your children, LEARN!<br />
If you want to be a true patriot and provide an example of true patriotism for your children, LEARN!<br />
An average 8th grader can learn it with my affordable 24-hour step-by-step <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> self-help course.<br />
<strong>You have no idea how easy it is to learn!</strong><br />
Lawyers don't want you to know, and <em>pseudo patriots </em>are too lost in their blind rage to see the light of truth and lift the lamp of liberty for you and your children!<br />
When a few million of you know how easy it is to learn the rules of court and how simple it is to command judges to take notice and rule in your favor, <em>your generation will turn the tide of international imperialism and restore our nation to honor with peace and prosperity under law!</em><br />
I've spent 25 years as a licensed attorney and tell you first-hand that you dare not trust the legal profession to stand against the on-rushing tide of imperial politics. <br />
<strong>The future of this nation and your children's welfare is in YOUR hands.</strong><br />
Learn the rules!<br />
Stop listening to the doomsayers! They have nothing to offer but doom. Ignore them. They are <em>not</em> patriots!<br />
<strong>Only YOU can prevent legal corruption!</strong><br />
Learn the rules and fight for Justice while you still can!<br />
Let <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> show you how!<br />
<a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Order now!</strong></a><br />
<strong>Or, if you already have the <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> course, forward this Tips & Tactics newsletter to friends!</strong><br />
Let's pull together and use the power of our courts to control those who would use law against us!<br />
<div align="right">Dr. Frederick D. Graves</div><div align="right"><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a><strong> ®</strong></strong></div><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/TellFriends.cfm" target="_blank">Use this link to send an email to all your friends to tell them about Jurisdictionary!</a></strong><br />
Take a few minutes and watch a video. Just click the judge to access the video. Essential tools and elements are explained in the video. Watch now by clicking the judge. <br />
<strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank">Click the Judge and WATCH THE VIDEO</a>.</strong><br />
Every winnable case can be won <em>before trial </em>if you follow the <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> method. <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank"><img align="right" alt="Judge" border="0" height="160" hspace="3" src="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/CFMail/Images/Judge.gif" vspace="4" width="166" /></a></strong><br />
<strong>Learn how to win the easy way!</strong><br />
If you want to win, you <em>must</em> do what I teach in my <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> course. <br />
Learn it all <em>step-by-step</em> in just 24-hours. <br />
Thousands have my course already in every State of the USA and in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, England, Ireland, and Puerto Rico.<br />
<strong>If you don't already have my course, <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">ORDER NOW</a>!</strong><br />
If you don't yet know what I teach, you cannot imagine how much fun it is to <em>force people </em>to do what's right by effectively using words and the official rules against them!<br />
Whether it's your opponent, some crooked highly-paid lawyer, or even a corrupt judge ... once you know what I teach, <em>you are in control!</em><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img align="right" alt="Learn from Jurisdictionary step-by-step" border="0" height="100" hspace="4" src="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Images/Animated/FreeTalkBanner.gif" vspace="4" width="125" /></a></strong><br />
That's how <strong>you win</strong> once you know what I teach in my popular step-by-step <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> course.<br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
It's affordable, too! The price will increase soon, but for now it's less than what you'd pay to chat with a lawyer for one brief hour ... still only $249 + $7.50 for Priority Mail.<br />
<strong>You get instant on-line access to the Video Seminar, Audio Classroom, and Complete Lawsuit Flowchart as soon as your order is placed.</strong><br />
Scheduled price increase coming soon! <br />
For more, go to: <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>www.Jurisdictionary.com</strong></a> NOW! <br />
==============================<wbr></wbr>=========== <br />
<strong>My affordable 24-hour step-by-step course includes: </strong><br />
<ul><li>5-hour video CD simplifies the process of litigation</li>
<li>2 audio CDs present practical litigation tactics </li>
<li>15 in-depth tutorials on 4th CD lay out basics</li>
<li>Instant On-Line Access while CDs are in the Mail</li>
<li>Still Only $249 (Plus $7.50 for Priority Mail)</li>
</ul><div align="center"><strong>Save legal fees! </strong></div><div align="center"><strong>Control judges!</strong></div><div align="center"><strong>Defeat crooked lawyers!</strong></div><div align="center"><em><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">www.Jurisdictionary.com</a></strong></em> </div>Ask anyone who has my course: "Jurisdictionary Works!"<br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
<div align="center"><strong>Call Toll Free for details: 866-Law-Easy</strong></div></td></tr>
</tbody></table><em>Pro se</em> people who use my course are winning in court!<br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
But! <em>Pro se </em>people often do <em>not </em>get justice.<br />
Why?<br />
Let's examine a few facts:<br />
<ol><li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know the rules.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know how to prevent the lawyer on the other side from playing tricks with the rules.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people make assumptions about what is "admissible evidence" and stuff that isn't.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know how to draft their pleadings or motions properly.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know why it's important to write proposed orders for the judge to sign.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know why, when, or how to make effective objections in court.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't understand what facts are critical to winning a case and what facts are of no consequence but only muddy the waters with court-confusing insignificance.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know why it's so vitally important to cite controlling appellate cases in support of their pre-trial and trial motions.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people don't know how to arrange for a written transcript to be made of <em>all</em> proceedings before the court, so they can control the judge.</li>
<li>Most <em>pro se </em>people waste valuable court time with non-essentials, fail to appreciate the needs of others who have their own problems to bring before the court and, as a consequence, tend to make judges dread <em>pro se </em>cases.</li>
</ol><em>Pro se </em>people who know what I explain so simply in the official <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> step-by-step 24-hour course are <em>winning and even getting compliments from judges and even opposing lawyers ... because they do it right!</em><br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
Not all judges are "against" <em>pro se </em>people "just because they are <em>pro se". </em>Most of the judges I knew in my 25 years were good people who cared about other people and did their best to guarantee justice <em>according to the rules.</em><br />
<strong>But! You must know how to protect yourself!</strong><br />
<em>Pro se </em>parties who know the rules and how to use them to protect themselves from courtroom corruption the way my <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> step-by-step 24-hour course makes so easy-to-understand <em>don't let crooked lawyers get away with their smoke-and-mirrors tricks!</em><br />
The difference between winners and losers is the fact that winners know how to win and losers cry about it!<br />
If you want to make it complicated and muddy the pond with all kinds of nutty arguments, you can do so, make the judge angry, and lose when your "evidence" isn't admitted because it isn't "admissible evidence", etcetera. <br />
You can demand your Constitutional Rights, instead of learning about causes of action and their elements that win lawsuits, <em>and you will lose</em>.<br />
You can refuse to learn the rules of evidence, the rules of procedure, and the tactics and strategies my course is so popular for making easy to learn, <em>and you will lose!</em><br />
<strong>But!</strong><br />
If you want to win, get my affordable <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> step-by-step 24-hour course <em><strong>now</strong></em> and master the case-winning strategies and tactics I used for 25 years as a case-winning lawyer in state and federal courts.<br />
<strong>There is only ONE "<em>Official Jurisdictionary</em>" course!</strong><br />
If you're paying a lawyer, know what your lawyer <em>should</em> be doing to earn his fee and <em>win </em>your case.<br />
If you don't have a lawyer, know what <em>you</em> must do to force the judge do what's right and <em>prevent the lawyer on the other side from cheating</em>.<br />
It's that simple.<br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
In short, you'll learn how to save money, maximize your winning power, and resolve conflicts peacefully and profitably ... according to the rules!<br />
<div align="center">______________________________<wbr></wbr>_</div>Once you master the simple concepts I teach, you'll be more powerful than most lawyers I met in 25 years as a licensed lawyer in state and federal courts as a licensed bar attorney!<br />
<div align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Click HERE to learn more!</a></strong></div>Many lawyers are afraid to upset judges, so they let things slide. They don't object. They don't "instruct" the judge on the law. They just lay back, take their hourly fee, and let their clients lose ... and those who pay lawyers yet don't know what <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> teaches about winning are led to the slaughter by their own lawyer.<br />
Sad, but true!<br />
<strong>I know what it takes to win. I did this 25 years!</strong><br />
My <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> will show you how in just 24-hours, step-by-step! <br />
<strong>The <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary Method</a> wins lawsuits!</strong><br />
Watch my <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank"><strong>video</strong></a> and see for yourself how easy it is to use knowledge, stealth, and wisdom to win in court!<br />
See what's important, what's not, and how to focus all your energy where it belongs: <strong>getting court orders!</strong><br />
If you gain from watching my <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank"><strong>video</strong></a>, please forward this newsletter to ALL YOUR FRIENDS by hitting "Forward" on your email program now.<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/TellFriends.cfm" target="_blank">Or use this link to send an email to all your friends</a></strong>. You probably know people who need to knock down judges and overcome crooked lawyers and their dishonest tricks. They will thank you for turning them on to this!<br />
Or, do both! Forward this newsletter AND <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/TellFriends.cfm" target="_blank"><strong>send emails to friends</strong></a> fighting in court who <em>desperately need to know how to win!</em><br />
Most lawyers never learn what <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> makes so easy-to-learn. People have been telling me since I started Jurisdictionary in 1997 that, "Your course should be required in first year law school." But, of course, that's not likely to happen, because what Jurisdictionary shows you <em>isn't politically correct!</em> I teach you how to control judges, instead of bowing to them, I I teach you how to overcome crooked lawyers and their all-too-common sneaky tricks!<br />
Political correctness prevents justice too often!<br />
Winning lawsuits is a brutal axe fight!<br />
<a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary is your axe!</strong></a><br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
Thousands of people just like you are winning with my easy-to-learn 24-hour step-by-step course. Ask anyone who has my course. <em>Everyone loves it!</em><br />
If you don't know what my course teaches, you lose!<br />
End of story!<br />
Winners do what <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>Jurisdictionary</strong></a> makes easy-to-learn and don't wait until trial to get justice!<br />
Those who learn my affordable 24-hour step-by-step <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> self-help course win ... no matter how high the odds are stacked against them! <br />
Winners know <em>how</em> to win!<br />
Losers believe internet fables. Losers get their legal education at the barbershop or on websites or expensive weekend seminars run by people who never practiced law, never went to law school, and don't know mud from sand about rules or how to use them to control judges.<br />
Too many good folks believe mythological silver-bullet easy solutions to their legal problems and, as a result, are losing <em>when they would be winning if they knew what I make so easy-to-learn in my <strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank">Jurisdictionary</a></strong> course!</em><br />
The internet is infested with hare-brained schemes that sound too good to be true ... and, like the old adage says, "If it sounds to good to be true, it probably isn't."<br />
Remember: The most dangerous falsehoods are ones we most want to believe!<br />
Why not learn from a real lawyer with nearly 25 years of case-winning experience?<br />
<strong>My course is not expensive!</strong><br />
People who finish my course say an average 8th grader can learn it all in a single weekend.<br />
<strong>Read the testimonials! ⇒</strong><br />
If you have a lawyer, you will save thousands in legal fees by knowing what your lawyer <em>should </em>be doing, and at the same time you will maximize your chances for success by making <em>certain </em>your lawyer does what <em>should </em>be done, instead of taking you for a ride to the poorhouse - as happens to too many good people these days.<br />
If you don't have a lawyer, you'll know how to stop the opponent's crooked tricks and control the judge!<br />
To learn more, go to: <a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><strong>www.Jurisdictionary.com</strong></a> <br />
<strong><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/Webinars/2009-07-29/2009-07-29.cfm" target="_blank">Click this link to watch VIDEO again</a>.</strong>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-4646380910269800232010-10-17T09:58:00.000-07:002010-10-17T10:00:09.547-07:00Know Your Miranda Rigths<div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Perhaps a Key Word everyone should know is "<b>Imminent Danger</b>" . Simply put, if someone comes knocking on your door and they have no proof of imminent danger, don't let them take your children. You may slightly open the door and show the children are in no danger. So many forget that being poor and/or an untidy home doesn't equal abuse.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">For those who have been faced with an allegation of abuse, I like to call this the first phase of this process... ie by not letting them in. Too often, once a child is in the clutches of and Child Protective Agency, they may not get their children back again, unless they truly know how to defend themselves and/or fall for the false information presented by the agency.</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">So take a moment and follow this link>> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Miranda"><b>Know Your Hatch Act/Miranda Rights </b></a></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><b><br />
</b></div><div style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Please share this with other families so they can know too!!!</div><br />
<b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</b><img height="30" src="http://rscrapz.com/glasses.jpg" width="45" /><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">GranPa Chuck</b><br />
<b> Check Out Our Collectibles>></b> <a href="http://rscrapz.com/" target="_blank">http://rscrapz.com</a> <br />
<b> My Family Rights Affiliation>></b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm" target="_blank">http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm</a><br />
<b> Defend Yourself>><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img border="1" height="20" src="http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/Jurisdictionary.gif" width="124" /></a></span></b>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-66218266598212794162010-10-17T09:35:00.000-07:002010-10-17T09:35:27.078-07:00New Foreclosure Suits Focus on the Lawyers<div style="color: blue; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">"First it was the bankers. Now, it appears, it's the lawyers.<br />
<br />
Each day seems to bring a new story of some homeowner being taken advantage of or being treated very poorly in connection with the housing crisis and foreclosure fraud scandal. So far the reports have focused primarily on the lenders and those working on the behalf of such lenders, but now comes <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202473458546&Suit_Against_Law_Firm_Could_Signal_Next_Wave_of_Mortgage_Modification_Fraud" target="_blank">news</a> of attorneys acting poorly and looking to capitalize on the crisis rather than help struggling homeowners.<br />
<br />
Not that we should be surprised at this point."</span></div><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: small;"> Read More>>><a href="http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/new-foreclosure-suits-focus-on-the-lawyers/"> http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/new-foreclosure-suits-focus-on-the-lawyers/</a></span> <br />
<b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</b><img height="30" src="http://rscrapz.com/glasses.jpg" width="45" /><b style="color: #000066; font-family: comic sans ms,sans-serif;">GranPa Chuck</b><br />
<b> Check Out Our Collectibles>></b> <a href="http://rscrapz.com/" target="_blank">http://rscrapz.com</a> <br />
<b> My Family Rights Affiliation>></b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm" target="_blank">http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm</a><br />
<b> Defend Yourself>><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.jurisdictionary.com/?refercode=FC0006" target="_blank"><img border="1" height="20" src="http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/Jurisdictionary.gif" width="124" /></a></span></b>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-75338910017911257772010-10-15T14:37:00.000-07:002010-10-15T14:37:44.402-07:00Demand Your Mortgage Note!!!The big banks' BS is starting to catch up to them.<br />
<br />
Last week, JPMorgan Chase announced they were halting foreclosures in 23 states. Turns out, the bankers in charge of approving the foreclosure paperwork weren't even reading what they were signing. Now, one by one, foreclosures at America's biggest banks are grinding to a halt. It's gotten so bad, several states are taking the banks to court - calling for an immediate freeze on all foreclosures.<br />
<br />
The banks created this mess, it's on them to clean it up. You have a right to know if your mortgage is affected. <a href="http://action.seiu.org/page/m/18a1f607/161af1a/585a2766/388bce6/3260875542/VEsE/" target="_blank" title="Wheresthenote.com"><b>If you're a homeowner, will you send a letter to your bank and demand to see your original mortgage note? You can do it online in less than five minutes: http://www.wheresthenote.com</b></a><br />
<br />
Wall Street has bought and sold our mortgages so many times, they've lost track of who owns what. And now they're getting caught red handed. In one state, two banks tried to foreclose on the same home. In another state, BofA tried to take a house away from a man who'd never even had a mortgage. The more we learn, the worse it gets.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://action.seiu.org/page/m/18a1f607/161af1a/585a2766/388bce6/3260875542/VEsF/" target="_blank" title="Wheresthenote.com"><b>It's time to pull the curtain all the way back. Demand to see YOUR mortgage note: http://www.wheresthenote.com</b></a><br />
<br />
Banks are calling these "technical glitches." These are more than technical glitches. These are monumental screw-ups that are forcing families out of their homes. The banks raise our rates and change our terms - and if we make one mistake, we pay with our homes.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://action.seiu.org/page/m/18a1f607/161af1a/585a2766/388bce6/3260875542/VEsC/" target="_blank" title="Wheresthenote.com"><b>Now it's our turn to demand accountability from them. Visit http://www.wheresthenote.com and demand to see your mortgage note.</b></a><br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
<b>Stephen Lerner</b><br />
SEIU.org<br />
<br />
PS - Don't have a mortgage? Pass this on to someone who does. Every single homeowner needs to know if their bank still holds their mortgage note.<br />
<img alt="" src="file:///C:/Users/owner/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-3.png" />Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-82245140641010080852010-08-19T09:00:00.000-07:002010-08-19T09:01:29.798-07:00Pro Se, Is it Right For You?It is unfortunate that through our lives with Our Families, many times there may be an allegation against us when Raising Our Families.<br />
<br />
As the keeper of the web files for nfpcar.org and one of the moderators of our Affiliated Discussion Group, going Pro Se has been a Topic of Discussion. Perhaps one of the First Questions one needs to ask themselves is "<b>Can I defend myself without being to emotionally involved??</b>" This is indeed a hard question to answer, since we all know when your family is threatened by an alleged allegation, it is hard not to be emotionally involved.<br />
<br />
However, no matter if you seek the council of a lawyer or decide to go Pro Se, you must do your home work and know All the statutes, policies, etc. for your state. In other words, organize your case and then decide if you want to go Pro Se.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Knowledge is Power</b></div>So as an introduction, and the start of your journey, here is our home page discussing Pro Se:<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/pro_se/">http://nfpcar.org/Legal/pro_se/</a></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: left;">As with any thing in life, learning is a "Never Ending Story". So here are more links you may want to check out. I will be organizing and adding these links to our Pro Se pages:</div><div style="text-align: left;"></div>You are at the <a href="http://caught.net/" target="_blank" title="The Caught.net Website">Caught.net</a> Legal Reform Website and the <a href="http://caught.net/prose/prose.htm" target="_blank" title="The Pro Se Way">Pro Se Way</a> Website <br />
<div><ul><li><a href="http://caught.net/" target="_blank" title="The Caught.net Website">Caught.Net</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/prose/prose.htm" target="_blank" title="The Pro Se Way - Pro se Information">Pro Se Way</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/prose/badjudge.htm" target="_blank" title="How To Handle Bad Judges">Handling Bad Judges</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/nwsltr/candef.htm" target="_blank" title="Tongue in cheek canons and legal terms">"Secret" Canons</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/prose/advtt/hbindex.htm" target="_blank" title="Advanced Trial Handbook">Trial Handbook</a></li>
</ul><ul><li><a href="http://caught.net/caught/judlstp.htm" target="_blank" title="Bad Judges List">Bad Judges List</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/caught/lawlstp.htm" target="_blank" title="Bad Lawyers List">Bad Lawyers List</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/legalabusesyndrome.htm" target="_blank" title="Legal Abuse Syndrome">Legal Abuse Syndrome</a></li>
<li><a href="http://caught.net/cases/cases.htm" target="_blank" title="Aggrieved Citizens List">Aggrieved Citizens List</a></li>
</ul>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
<i><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: maroon;">May you find strength in your Higher Power, </span> </span></b></i><br />
<i><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="mailto:granpachuck99@gmail.com?subject=Questions%20to%20GranPa%20Chuck">GranPa Chuck</a><span style="color: maroon;"><br />
Any Links that Don't Work; or if you<br />
want to add information, Please Contact</span></span></b><span style="color: maroon; font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span><span style="color: maroon; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <a href="http://rscrapz.com/rWeb/index.html" target="_blank">Website Powered by GPC</a></span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: maroon;"><br />
</span><a href="http://rscrapz.com/rWeb/index.html"> <img border="0" height="31" src="http://nfpcar.org/resources_files/image002.jpg" width="48" /></a></span></i><br />
<div align="center"><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><i> <b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
"Did You Know Series?" <a href="http://nfpcar.org/FPA/emails/Current.htm#3" target="_blank"> Subscribe Today</a></span></b></i></div></div><div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Legal/pro_se/index.htm" target="_blank"> Thinking of going pro se?</a></span></div><div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"></div></div>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-81919414581038976822010-05-31T07:22:00.000-07:002010-05-31T07:22:34.932-07:00Is BP intentionally avoiding capping the Gulf spill well?<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Interesting Article for your Consideration, <a href="http://rscrapz.com/Grand">GranPa Chuck</a><br />
<img align="left" hspace="8" src="http://www.naturalnews.com/images/authors/MikeAdams.jpg" style="min-height: 51px; width: 50px;" /> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Dear NaturalNews readers,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">I spent the day on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi, talking to the locals and conducting interviews with people about the BP oil spill disaster.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">I can tell you first-hand that <em>people are enraged</em> over the situation, and nobody down here trusts anything BP is saying anymore.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">I filmed several video interviews which we expect to start posting tomorrow.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">In the mean time, I learned about a new <strong>disturbing theory</strong> that says BP isn't actually trying to CAP the oil well in the Gulf. Rather, they appear to be intentionally trying to keep it flowing so they can TAP it and harvest the oil for profit.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Read more about this disturbing revelation in today's feature story:<br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/028898_British_Petroleum_Gulf_Coast.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/<wbr></wbr>028898_British_Petroleum_Gulf_<wbr></wbr>Coast.html</a></span></span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-61531923216142142682010-05-29T13:50:00.000-07:002010-05-29T13:50:25.932-07:00In Memory of my Partner in CrimeHere is OUR Wedding Vows and a Song we shared every anniversary. Would have been 20 years 01/01/2011. Love You, my partner in crime. Link:<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PP1HEFlkdY" onmousedown="UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), "d6e71", event);" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span>http://www.youtube.com/wat</span><wbr></wbr><span class="word_break"></span>ch?v=5PP1HEFlkdY<br />
<img alt="" src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Family/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png" /></a>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-22792995697951567612010-05-29T13:14:00.000-07:002010-05-29T13:14:17.205-07:00I am NOT Alone on Racial Profiling vs US CensusThought I would just check to see if others felt as I did... So did a Google search on "<b>us census racial profiling</b>" Here is a link just to the FIRST Page; (Isn't the Internet Nice!!)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=us+census+racial+profiling&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a">http://www.google.com/search?q=us+census+racial+profiling&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a</a><br />
There were 117,000 plus entries<br />
<br />
May You Find Strength in Your Higher Power,<br />
GranPa Chuck<br />
<a href="http://nfpcar.org/Miranda"><b>Know Your Hatch Act/Miranda Rights</b></a><br />
<br />
<span class="csb" style="background-position: -24px 0pt; width: 28px;"></span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-18564746363684253612010-05-29T12:57:00.000-07:002010-05-29T13:21:52.700-07:00Again: US Census Robot Comes to My DoorIn previous posts I have shared feelings about the US Census being Racial Profiling. Well today I told the lady I am not answering the Simple Form. So to All, here is what I feel is needed.<br />
<ul><li>We were a 7 member multigenerational family. My beloved wife passed from earth on her Journey Through Life... And now we are six.</li>
<li>My father was Swiss and My mother was Italian... So I guess that makes me a Swiss-Italian</li>
<li>My father learned how to Read English from Comic Books.. And successfully owned a Dairy for 35 years.</li>
<li>I'm a Native of California... But recently flew, and the check points made me feel like an Alien and NOT a Native Citizen of Swiss/Italian decent. </li>
</ul>The laws talk of Privacy.. So I say, that just refers to your name sake... But goodness, me, one now knows the mix of designated Minorities vs Caucasians.<br />
<br />
So, if you read this, and whether you have filled out the US Census, please add a note to this. I may need it, if the Feds come after me.<br />
<br />
<b>Show Me the Law</b>>> Reverse Miranda Blog-- <a href="http://mirandaawarness.blogspot.com/2008/05/show-me-lawknow-your-miranda-rights.html">http://mirandaawarness.blogspot.com/2008/05/show-me-lawknow-your-miranda-rights.html</a> <br />
<br />
In Advance Thanks for Listening, GranPa ChuckDefend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-22429609670488202492010-05-29T08:40:00.000-07:002010-05-29T08:40:20.733-07:00Two more Census workers blow the whistle<div class="collapsed"><div class="entry-date"><b>Just additional info on US Census as more info from another post: <a href="http://mirandaawarness.blogspot.com/2010/05/racial-profiling-look-at-whole-picture.html">http://mirandaawarness.blogspot.com/2010/05/racial-profiling-look-at-whole-picture.html</a></b> </div><div class="entry-date">May 28, 2010</div><div class="entry-main"><span class="entry-source-title">Grandparents blog</span><div class="entry-secondary"><h2 class="entry-title">Two more Census workers blow the whistle</h2><span class="entry-secondary-snippet"> - <span class="snippet">Two more Census workers blow the whistle Last Updated: 1:23 AM, May 25, 2010 Posted: 12:42 AM, May 25, 2010 John Crudele You know the old saying: "Everyone loves a charade." Well, it seems that t...</span></span></div></div></div><div class="entry-date">May 28, 2010</div><h2 class="entry-title"><a class="entry-title-link" href="http://unhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/two-more-census-workers-blow-whistle.html" target="_blank">Two more Census workers blow the whistle</a></h2><div class="entry-author"><span class="entry-source-title-parent">from <a class="entry-source-title" href="https://www.google.com/reader/view/feed/http%3A%2F%2Funhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com%2Ffeeds%2Fposts%2Fdefault" target="_blank">Grandparents blog</a></span> <span class="entry-author-parent">by <span class="entry-author-name">unhappygrammy</span></span></div>Two more Census workers blow the whistle<br />
Last Updated: 1:23 AM, May 25, 2010<br />
Posted: 12:42 AM, May 25, 2010<br />
<br />
<br />
John Crudele<br />
You know the old saying: "Everyone loves a charade." Well, it seems that the Census Bureau may be playing games.<br />
Last week, one of the millions of workers hired by Census 2010 to parade around the country counting Americans blew the whistle on some statistical tricks.<br />
The worker, Naomi Cohn, told The Post that she was hired and fired a number of times by Census. Each time she was hired back, it seems, Census was able to report the creation of a new job to the Labor Department.<br />
Below, I have a couple more readers who worked for Census 2010 and have tales to tell.<br />
<br />
But first, this much we know.<br />
Each month Census gives Labor a figure on the number of workers it has hired. That figure goes into the closely followed monthly employment report Labor provides. For the past two months the hiring by Census has made up a good portion of the new jobs.<br />
Labor doesn't check the Census hiring figure or whether the jobs are actually new or recycled. It considers a new job to have been created if someone is hired to work at least one hour a month.<br />
One hour! A month! So, if a worker is terminated after only one hour and another is hired in her place, then a second new job can apparently be reported to Labor . (I've been unable to get Census to explain this to me.)<br />
Here's a note from a Census worker -- this one from Manhattan:<br />
"John: I am on my fourth rehire with the 2010 Census.<br />
"I have been hired, trained for a week, given a few hours of work, then laid off. So my unemployed self now counts for four new jobs.<br />
"I have been paid more to train all four times than I have been paid to actually produce results. These are my tax dollars and your tax dollars at work.<br />
"A few months ago I was trained for three days and offered five hours of work counting the homeless. Now, I am knocking (on) doors trying to find the people that have not returned their Census forms. I worked the 2000 Census. It was a far more organized venture.<br />
"Have to run and meet my crew leader, even though with this rain I did not work today. So I can put in a pay sheet for the hour or hour and a half this meeting will take. Sincerely, C.M."<br />
And here's another:<br />
"John: I worked for (Census) and I was paid $18.75 (an hour) just like Ms. Naomi Cohn from your article.<br />
"I worked for about six weeks or so and I picked the hours I wanted to work. I was checking the work of others. While I was classifying addresses, another junior supervisor was checking my work.<br />
"In short, we had a "checkers checking checkers" quality control. I was eventually let go and was told all the work was finished when, in fact, other people were being trained for the same assignment(s).<br />
"I was re-hired about eight months later and was informed that I would have to go through one week of additional training.<br />
"On the third day of training, I got sick and visited my doctor. I called my supervisor and asked how I can make up the class. She informed me that I was 'terminated.' She elaborated that she had to terminate three other people for being five minutes late to class.<br />
"I did get two days' pay and I am sure the 'late people' got paid also. I think you would concur that this is an expensive way to attempt to control sickness plus lateness. I am totally convinced that the Census work could be very easily done by the US Postal Service.<br />
"When I was trying to look for an address or had a question about a building, I would ask the postman on the beat. They knew the history of the route and can expand in detail who moved in or out etc. I have found it interesting that if someone works one hour, they are included in the labor statistics as a new job being full.<br />
"I am not surprised that you can't get any answers from Census staff; I found there were very few people who knew the big picture. M.G."<br />
When I received my Census form in the mail, I filled it out. Nobody had to knock on my door.<br />
I answered truthfully about the number of people living in my household. But I could have just as easily dou bled the number. Why not? Didn't Census ad vertisements imply that my community would get more federal money if the popula tion were larger?<br />
I'm glad people are finding work with the Census. For some it's the only work they have had this year and the chump change they are making for a few hours' work is a godsend.<br />
But wasting taxpayers' money on busywork isn't going to do much for the economy. john.crudele@nypost.com<br />
<br />
<br />
Read more: <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/two_more_census_workers_blow_the_OqY80N3DBTvL17VmxKKR0O#ixzz0pG6AEfwr">http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/two_more_census_workers_blow_the_OqY80N3DBTvL17VmxKKR0O#ixzz0pG6AEfwr</a>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-56180123048018814552010-05-29T07:17:00.000-07:002010-05-29T07:17:47.222-07:00Money is the Root of All Evil????Have heard so many say <b>"Money is the Root of All Evil."</b> <br />
But then he adds "Don't we as Families, Individuals, etc. need M-O-N-E-Y to Survive?? As in heading, Greed is the Root of All Evil. To quote and advertisement "It is My Money and I want it know.<br />
<br />
I am continuously asking everyone to look at ALL the concerns that effect them and their families. One way I have been doing this is to try to give links on our <a href="http://nfpcar.org/">nfpcar.org website</a>. We need answers and we, as an individual are the ones to do this. Fraud is rampart in so many of our Government and Big Business. One, of many examples, is here in CA where a group of Dr.s and nurses were caught in a Medicaid Fraud Scam = $60 Million. (Now times that times 50).<br />
<br />
In an earlier post I gave another agency we may want to give facts to.. ie GAO. Also here are other agencies. Please note, the more they hear from individuals, the more likely they are to react to the concerns.<br />
<br />
<h1 align="center"><b><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial; font-size: small;">Voice Your Concerns</span></b></h1><ul><li> <div align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <strong style="font-weight: 400;"><em> <a href="http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/hotline/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Fraud Hotline</a></em></strong></span></div></li>
<li> <div align="left"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <strong style="font-weight: 400;"><em> <a href="https://tips.fbi.gov/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Fraud Tips and Leads</a></em></strong></span></div></li>
<li> <div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"> <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong style="font-weight: 400;"><em> <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/cpsfilessite/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> The Central Registry of Child Welfare Fraud</a></em></strong></span></div></li>
<li> <div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;"> <span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> <img alt="Hotline
icon" src="http://oig.hhs.gov/images/icon_hotline.gif" /> <a href="http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/hotline/OIG_Hotline_Poster.pdf" target="_blank"> Download the Contractor Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Poster</a> </span><acronym class="file_type" title="Portable Document Format"><span style="font-size: x-small;">(PDF)</span></acronym></span></div></li>
</ul><h1 align="center"> Granpa Chuck<br />
<a href="http://rscrapz.com/">Visit rFamily Website</a><br />
</h1>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-48981424993721716442010-05-29T06:33:00.000-07:002010-05-29T06:34:24.329-07:00Racial Profiling ~ Look at the Whole Picture<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Group Project: Don't Fill Out the US Census</b></span> </div>A few days ago, I returned from FL, I had a census taker coming to my door.. At this point, I refuse to fill in the questionnaire... ie Key Word>>>>>; <b>Racial Profiling</b>... Not to mention I feel our <b>Laws are in Conflict</b>.<br />
<br />
In addition, it will be good practice for all of us to use the Principles of "Creating Your Law Book" found in "Standing in the Shadow of the Law", currently free for all to use (<a href="http://nfpcar.org/Shadow/6/indexprint.htm">Link: http://nfpcar.org/Shadow/6/indexprint.htm</a> )<br />
<br />
So here is a simple Legal Order, according to the Census Bureau's handout:<br />
<ol><li>"<b>Your are required by Law to provide the information requested.</b>"</li>
<li>According to US Code Title 13 (Section 9, 141, 193, 214, 221); and Title 44 (Sec. 2108); <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fosterparentallegations/message/www.census.gov/2010census">www.census.gov/2010census</a> </li>
<li><b>Why do we need Census? "We need to count people whey they live and sleep most of the time.</b>"</li>
</ol><b>My Answer</b>: We are a multigenerational family with 7 members in our household. But recently Grand Ma passed and we now have 6.<br />
<br />
<b>So he asks, doesn't this meet the requirements of #3????</b><br />
<br />
So group, for those who want to take the challenge, help me get "my ducks in line" (unlegal definition of organizing you case) to respond to the census bureau, or else GranPa Chuck may be in Fed Prision...<br />
Granpa Chuck<br />
<a href="http://rscrapz.com/">Visit rFamily Site</a>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-20625918504743720062010-05-21T16:23:00.001-07:002010-05-21T16:23:42.625-07:00Tell Attorney General Holder to Keep His Hands Off the Miranda Rule<span style="color: #333333; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"> <br style="line-height: 10px;" /> In the wake of the attempted bombing in Times Square in May 2010—as after other terrorism attempts—there have been misguided calls to weaken our constitutional rights, including a call to loosen the Miranda rule. <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that the administration wants to "modernize" and "clarify" Miranda warnings for terrorism suspects. Miranda warnings—ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to be a constitutional right—are used to inform suspects of their rights during interrogation. <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> There is no evidence that the Miranda requirement has obstructed the government from obtaining valuable information and intelligence from suspected terrorists. <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> Both Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who was caught on a Detroit-bound plane with explosives in his underwear, and Faisal Shahzad, arrested for trying to bomb Times Square with a car full of explosives, were caught, questioned, and Mirandized. Crucially, both cooperated with law enforcement authorities both before and after they were read their Miranda rights. <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> The ACLU thinks changes to Miranda are both threatening to our criminal justice system and entirely unnecessary. This week, we sent a letter to Holder asking him to leave Miranda alone. And we're not the only ones who think this is a bad idea; three former FBI agents also sent a letter to Holder, writing: <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> "As professional interrogators who have spent decades questioning accused criminals—including spies and terrorists—we are writing to make clear that interrogators can do their job using the existing Miranda rules. No changes are necessary. In fact, changes might do more harm than good." <br />
<br style="line-height: 10px;" /> <strong>>> Take action: <a href="http://action.aclu.org/site/R?i=b1sn08L2iXUVvvyiwiWHxw.." target="_blank">Send a message to Attorney General Holder. Tell him to keep his hands off the Miranda rule!</a></strong> </span>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7753708424459052390.post-82605282932130363042010-05-20T11:15:00.000-07:002010-05-20T11:40:09.040-07:00Empty Nest Syndrome~The Rest of the Story<div style="color: blue;"><span style="font-size: small;">This is part of a Series of Continual developing parts that many may want to follow.<br />
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,</span></div><div style="color: blue;"><span style="font-size: small;">GranPa Chuck</span></div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: blue;">````````````````````````</span></span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b> <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/index.htm#Topics_" name="Empty_Nesters">Empty Nesters</a></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/Danger/index.htm#Part_1_-">Part 1</a> ~ <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/Danger/index.htm#Part_2_-">Part 2</a></span><br />
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b></b></span></div><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=8260528293213036304" name="Part_1_-">Part 1 -</a> Empty Nest Syndrome</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Frequently we become aware of <b>alarming situations </b>that need opened up for discussion. The title of this series of articles, from the term "<b><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_nest_syndrome" target="_blank">Empty Nest Syndrome</a></b>", we are exposing one of those dangerous situations. Someone needs to speak up on this issue. </span><br />
<div class="examiners_body"><span style="font-family: Arial;">Parents, who have raised their children, find they are suddenly feeling alone, senior citizens suffering from a sense of loneliness, who are at this time in their lives <b>vulnerable to the advertising they see on television, in magazines</b> across the country, Arizona too. In these ads we listen to pleas for help, possibly even seeing the faces of helpless child (ren), in need of love and someone to hold them.</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>Mature Americans are extremely country oriented;</b> usually responding to our State or Nations call for assistance. Bombarded with advertising using words like "empty nesters" we start thinking that we successfully raised our own children and this ad seems to understand that. Missing your children that filled your homes with laughter, the challenges of parenthood, this <b> loneliness is our vulnerability </b>to someone wishing to <b>fill your home for you. </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">Possibly, your living on a very tight fixed income, most find themselves challenged in this tight pressed economy, and your thinking about maybe supplementing your small income by doing something that you would want to do anyway, even helping a child at the same time. Thoughts of children to care for again, filling these empty beds, filling these empty rooms with children who so desperately need someone. <b>You are needed after all!</b> T his is exactly what this advertising is <b>designed by experts to do</b>.</span><br />
<ul><li><span style="font-family: Arial;">These ads make you feel like contributing again....your a loving person; you can still be useful to someone, your not too old to do it again. <b> Are any of these thoughts sounding familiar to you? </b> </span></li>
</ul><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>These thoughts are what make you vulnerable to a system that desperately needs foster parents</b>. The ads that are running are very convincing, even enticing, as all advertising is; that is what makes us all buy into <b> their sales pitches</b>. However, what about warnings on other advertising campaigns, do you see any on these? How many people would buy into their programs if there were warnings? Read on!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"> <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-46864-Phoenix-Foster-Families-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d18-Did-you-know--Foster-Parents-needed-Empty-Nesters-Vulnerable-Part-1-of-2"> <span style="font-size: x-small;"> http://www.examiner.com/x-46864-Phoenix-Foster-Families-Examiner~y2010m5d18-Did-you-know--Foster-Parents-needed-Empty-Nesters-Vulnerable-Part-1-of-2</span></a> </span></div><div align="center"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/Danger/index.htm#Top"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Return to Index</span></a></div><b><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7753708424459052390&postID=8260528293213036304" name="Part_2_-"> Part 2 -</a> Empty Nest Syndrome<br />
</span></b><br />
<div class="examiners_body"><span style="font-family: Arial;">In <a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/Danger/index.htm#Part_1_-">part one</a> of this article we were exploring the <b>need for foster parents</b> and the advertising seen stating this need, Arizona needs foster parents too.</span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>However, how many warnings have you seen following these ads</b>? Yes, the need is real, but should <b>senior citizens come to the rescue</b>? </span><br />
<div align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> <b>Your early warning system is being activated in this article. </b></span></div><ul><li><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>Beware of becoming a foster parent. </b>We understand that you are well intentioned however, there are things you need to be made aware of; one is <b>the hurricane that can follow</b>, storms that the advertising does not warn you about.</span></li>
</ul><span style="font-family: Arial;">The agency will not tell you anything about the child (ren) that you are taking into your home because of the "<b><a href="http://www.hhs.gov/foia/privacy/index.html" target="_blank">Privacy Act</a></b>". Social workers and agencies <b>cannot inform you of these things</b>. Many of these precious children are dealing with <b>severe emotional and/or physical damage</b>, and even medically challenged in other capacities. You will have behavioral problems that you simply may not be up to, or want to deal with.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><b>You are capable; it is not you</b>, but the <b>broken system</b>, that is found incapable. The children that you would be dealing with have been traumatized, ripped out of their homes, (their biological parents homes), moved from one foster home to another, and as a result can be emotionally damaged.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">You can however, assist in many other ways. Number one educate yourself on the Foster Care System, become informed. If you desire to help in this arena, do not allow yourself to be vulnerable to these enticing advertisements. The source of information and an educational website is <a href="http://nfpcar.org/" target="_blank"> nfpcar.org</a> </span></div><b><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"> <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-46864-Phoenix-Foster-Families-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d18-Did-you-know--Foster-Parents-needed-Empty-Nesters-Vulnerable-Part-2-of-2" target="_blank"> http://www.examiner.com/x-46864-Phoenix-Foster-Families-Examiner~y2010m5d18-Did-you-know--Foster-Parents-needed-Empty-Nesters-Vulnerable-Part-2-of-2 </a></span></b> <br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://nfpcar.org/Archive/Phoenix/Danger/index.htm#Top"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Return to Index</span></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div>Defend Yourselfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15661366746055371328noreply@blogger.com0