FACFCPA Blog Talk - A Must Hear

FAC FIGHTING CPS
ON BLOG TALK RADIO
FRIDAY FEBRUARY 25, 2011

FACFCPS BLOGTALK # 51: 8th PART OF A SERIES:

TONIGHT'S SHOW FOR FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2011,
DEDICATED TO THE 8th COURT CIRCUIT, WHICH
INCLUDES THE STATES OF: 
AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, & WA.

ALSO: DUE TO THE UPCOMING PLANS OF A RALLY,
TO BE HELD ON AUG 12, 2011,
AND
TO THE CONFERENCE CALL OF NEW YORK ATTORNEY,
 LEON KOZIOL
(which notices have been sent out to all, regarding that telephone
conference, by me, on Sunday, Feb 13, 2011),
WE WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSING OUR OPINIONS OF THAT
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL, AS WELL AS WHAT WE
ARE PLANNING FOR AUGUST 12, 2011.

ATTORNEY LEON KOZIOL IS A FORMER CONGRESSMAN
AND A SCHOOL BOARD ATTORNEY, WHO HAS BEEN
PRACTICING LAW FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS AS A CIVIL
RIGHTS ATTORNEY, & FOUNDED THE GROUP,
"PARENTS RIGHTS INSTITUTE,"
WHICH IS A GROUP OF PARENTS FIGHTING TO REFORM
CUSTODY AND CHILD SUPPORT LAWS IN THE STATE OF
NEW YORK (AND BEYOND?).

Listen to Leon Kozial on blog talk radio, with Syndicated News:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/syndicatednews/2010/10/21/leon-koziol-is-an-alienated-parent-that-also-fight

Read Leon Kozial's announcement "Parent's Alert!"
http://leonkoziol.com/

NOW: INFO REGARDING THE BLOG TALK:
{I am including links to my google site, which I've dumped thousands of files,
pertaining to laws, court forms, etc, including info for various states}

ARKANSAS:

ARIZONA:

CALIFORNIA:

AND THE INFAMOUS STORY OF DEANNA FOGARTY-
HARDWICK:
Published: May 21, 2007 3:00 a.m.
Mom sees social services win as help for others:VICTORIOUS MOM: Deanna Fogarty recently won a $4.9
 million judgement against the County of Orange after social
 workers wrongfully took her children away from her.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/Fogarty-Hardwick/social_services/prweb4157254.htm

HAWAII:

IDAHO:

MONTANA:

NEVADA:

WASHINGTON:
ah, Washington; the home of the infamous
Troxel Case
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
TROXEL et vir. v. GRANVILLEhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-138.ZS.html

PLEASE NOTE:
Have more info on the sites located on the
webs social network, which links I've also
included, and within the google site I've
created:
https://sites.google.com/site/facfcpsinfo/home

FIRST: PLEASE TAKE NOTE:
You can either log into the blog talk page and listen to the show on
your computer, and/or use the call in number, especially if you'd like
to participate.

IF YOU CALL INTO THE PROGRAM:
Please push or dial number 1 on your phone pad, and I will know that
you would like to speak on the program.

HOWEVER:
I am not able to view people's names, only phone numbers; so please
be advised that I will only call out your area code and say,
"You're on the air!"

Lisa NJGrandma4justice
4 FAMILIES AGAINST CORRUPTION FIGHTING CPS
(FACFCPS)

HERE IS THE INFORMATION FOR THIS SATURDAY NIGHT'S AIRING:
((please click on the show's name, or the link directly below that,
to be brought straight to the show's page))

FAMILIES AGAINST CORRUPTION FIGHTING CPSDate:           FRIDAY FEBRUARY 25, 2011TIME:          11 PM EST  {Eastern Savings Time}                     10 PM CST  {Central Savings Time}                       9 PM MST {Mountain Savings Time}                       8 PM PST   Pacific Savings Time}
Category: Family
Call-in Number:   1-646-727-1679
OUR SHOWS ARE DEDICATED FOR OUR DEAR, BELOVED FRIEND,
ROBIN {06/18/80~06/18/10}, AS SHE IS NOW WITH ANGELS,
WATCHING OVER HER PRECIOUS CHILDREN.  WE SUPPORT
HER FAMILY AS THEY TAKE ROBIN'S PLACE IN FAMILY
COURT~ FIGHTING CPS!

CHAT ROOM:To participate in the chat room, scroll down the page; you can enter
the chat room as a guest, or you can log into your blogtalk account,
and your user name for blog talk will appear in the participant's
window, as long you sign in (and have an account with blogtalkradio.com).
NOTE: This is NOW A 30 MINUTE blog talk, but we have up to
1 HOUR To talk together; however, the first 30 minutes of the
show will be recorded,and available for others to listen at any
time by visiting the show page, and using the blogtalk radio player.
NOTE: in order to be able to participate in the blogtalk, or to
participate in the chat room, you must call into the show, or enter
the chat room, within the first 30 minutes of this blogtalk; forthose who called in and/or enter the chat prior to the end of theshow (11:30 pm est),they will continue to remain on the call until12 am EST, but can remain in the Chat Room indefinitely.Also Note:
no one will be able to call in or enter chat room after 1130pm EST.
You can also click to below link, and then click on tonight's
show; if you do not see the chat room loading, after you
scroll down, then the chat room has not yet been opened
by me..
HOST:  FamiliesAgainstCorruption


Gathering of souls tarnished, but not totally
destroyed, by corrupted cps employees.

DISCLAIMER: WE ARE NOT ATTORNEYS:
I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, HOWEVER, I AM A GRADUATE OF A PARALEGAL PROGRAM,
FROM A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AND DO HAVE AN AAS IN LEGAL ASSISTING;
THEREFORE, I CAN ASSIST OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND THE LAWS THAT PERTAIN
TO OUR GOVERNMENT'S ILLEGAL ABDUCTION OF OUR BELOVED CHILDREN,
as I can explain the laws/statutes, but without, actually, providing legal advice.
We, as a group, have many opinions, and opinions, as well as suggestions, are
warmly received (nothing wrong with arguing points, as this is what SUPPOSED
to go on in a 'court of law').

Also, any comment made by any quest of this show does not necessarily mirror
the beliefs of this blogtalk's owner, and vice versa; please note that under our
First Amendment (Free Speech), we are all entitled to our opinions, and are
able to express such, as per our Constitutional Rights.
LISA NJG4JUSTICE
njgrandma4justice@yahoo.com
facfcps@gmail.com

       Lisa NJG  "No one can make you feel inferior without your consent" Eleanor Roosevelt njgrandma4justice@yahoo.commyspace.com/njgrandma4justice 

AZ Sheriffs Can't Read Fourth Amendment

According to the article noted at the bottom of this blog, a statement made:

"The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was not clear enough for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home violated the Fourth Amendment. "

_____________

Thought I missed something, so for all of us to read. Do you understand these words?? as it seems the sheriffs in AZ didn't understand. (Please note, I also have a link in Spanish)
 Fourth Amendment
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."



Enmienda 4
El derecho de los habitantes de que sus personas, domicilios, papeles y efectos se hallen a salvo de pesquisas y aprehensiones arbitrarias, será inviolable, y no se expedirán al efecto mandamientos que no se apoyen en un motivo verosimil, estén corroborados mediante juramento o protesta y describan con particularidad el lugar que deba ser registrado y las personas o cosas que han de ser detenidas o embargadas.

___________________

I wonder what grade the sheriffs got in the US Constitution Test??? (Ref: http://nfpcar.org/Constitution/index.htm & Most Definitely: http://nfpcar.org/Miranda/  )

_________________

Here is the story:
Original Link: http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/az/201101240.asp

Appellate Briefs Filed in Arizona Illegal-Search Case

In March of 2005, two social workers and six deputy sheriffs descended on the home of John and Tiffany Loudermilk to “investigate” a two-month-old anonymous tip that their house was unsafe for children. After almost an hour of threats, the social workers finally threatened to take all of their children into custody if not allowed inside. The Loudermilks reluctantly agreed. The assembled officials took less than five minutes to determine that the allegations in the anonymous report were false.

HSLDA reviewed the case and sued the social workers, their attorney, and four of the deputies for violating the Loudermilks’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. We also sued the social workers for threatening to remove their children without justification.

The judge denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss in September 2007, and then denied their motions for summary judgment in March 2010. The deputies appealed, claiming that they should be immune from liability because, they said, the right to be free from unreasonable searches was not clear enough for them to realize that threatening to remove a child if not allowed inside the home violated the Fourth Amendment.

Click here to read their brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
In HSLDA’s answering brief, we argued that the law has been clearly established for at least 10 years, ever since we successfully sued social workers on behalf of the Calabretta family in a similar case. We also demonstrated that any reasonable officer should know that threatening to remove a child to gain the “cooperation” of the parents is inherently coercive and that the officers should have known so at the time.
Within the next few weeks the appellate court will either decide the case or will schedule oral argument. In the meantime, proceedings in the trial court are on hold.

Other Resources

“Judge Upholds Family’s Right to Day in Court”
July/August 2010 Court Report: “Family Wins Round Two”
September/October 2009 Court Report: “Arguments Proceed in Federal Lawsuit”
January/February 2008 Court Report: “Judge Slams Coercive Tactics”
“Judge Rules Social Worker Fear Tactics Unconstitutional”
“Social Workers and Sheriff’s Deputies Violate Family’s 4th and 14th Amendment Rights”
 ____________________
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
Granpa Chuck